@VraserX: Scientists at Lila initially thought their AI workflow had gone wrong. The materials it selected looked unpromising. Th…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Scientists at Lila initially doubted their AI workflow's material selections, but continued testing revealed a catalyst that survived over 1,000 hours in acidic lab conditions, highlighting the value of exploring unconventional ideas in research.

Scientists at Lila initially thought their AI workflow had gone wrong. The materials it selected looked unpromising. They kept testing. Lila now reports that its leading catalyst survived over 1,000 hours in acidic lab conditions. I'd give every research lab a budget for testing ideas its senior people think won't work. How much would you set aside for the possibility that your best experts are wrong?
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/28/26, 03:34 PM

Scientists at Lila initially thought their AI workflow had gone wrong. The materials it selected looked unpromising.

They kept testing. Lila now reports that its leading catalyst survived over 1,000 hours in acidic lab conditions.

I’d give every research lab a budget for testing ideas its senior people think won’t work.

How much would you set aside for the possibility that your best experts are wrong?

Similar Articles

AI helps design new materials that work in the real world

MIT News — Artificial Intelligence

MIT researchers introduced a framework called CrysVCD that enhances the chemical stability of AI-generated materials by enforcing valence rules, making them more suitable for real-world applications like computer chips and rockets.