What belongs in a handoff file when one AI agent has to continue another agent's work?

Reddit r/AI_Agents News

Summary

The article discusses the optimal structure for handoff files in multi-agent AI workflows, recommending separated elements like objectives, state, and constraints to prevent noise and version drift, while comparing Markdown and JSON for readability and machine validation.

A transcript contains too much noise, while a short summary can omit the exact files, links, and decisions needed to continue safely. A useful handoff might separate the objective, current state, authoritative files and assets, constraints, decisions with rationale, failed approaches, validation already completed, permissions, unresolved risks, and the next concrete action. It should also mark assumptions, identify outputs that may be overwritten, and preserve source links instead of copying unsupported claims into the summary. Which fields consistently prevent repeated work or version drift in multi-agent workflows? Is a human-readable Markdown file enough, or is structured JSON worth maintaining alongside it for status, dependencies, and machine validation?
Original Article

Similar Articles

Handoff pattern with AI Harnesses

Reddit r/AI_Agents

A handoff pattern for Claude Code and other AI agent harnesses allows tasks to be delegated to fresh sessions, avoiding usage caps, performance degradation, and high costs by generating a script for another session to execute specific tasks.