Comparing Socio-technical Design Principles with Guidelines for Human-centered AI

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This paper compares socio-technical design principles with guidelines for human-centered AI, analyzing their similarities and differences to inform future AI design approaches.

arXiv:2607.10331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human-centered AI (HCAI) refers to guidelines or principles that aim on ethi-cally oriented design of systems. We compare HCAI- guidelines with princi-ples of socio-technical systems that emerged in the context of conventional in-formation technology. The comparison leads to a revision of socio-technical heuristics by including aspects of AI-usage. The comparison reveals that con-tinuous evolution is a basic characteristic of socio-technical systems, and that human oversight or interventions and the subsequent appropriation of AI-systems lead to continuous adaptation and re-design of the systems, if autono-my is collaboratively exercised. From a socio-technical point of view, the cru-cial requirement of transparency has not only to be fulfilled with technical fea-tures, but also by contributions of the whole system including human actors. It will be promising for using AI, if not only technical features, but organization-al and social practices are socio-technically designed in a way that compen-sates shortcomings of AI.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/14/26, 04:20 AM

# Comparing Socio-technical Design Principles with Guidelines for Human-centered AI
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10331](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10331)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

Imperfectly Cooperative Human-AI Interactions: Comparing the Impacts of Human and AI Attributes in Simulated and User Studies

arXiv cs.CL

This research paper investigates how human personality traits and AI design characteristics jointly impact human-AI interactions in imperfectly cooperative scenarios using both simulated datasets (2,000 simulations) and human subjects experiments (290 participants). The study finds significant divergences between simulation and real-world interactions, with AI transparency emerging as a critical factor in actual human-AI encounters.

AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide

Hugging Face Daily Papers

This paper surveys the capabilities and limitations of AI across the full research lifecycle, from idea generation to dissemination, identifying a sharp boundary between reliable assistance and unreliable autonomy. It provides a taxonomy, benchmark suite, tool inventory, and design principles for human-governed AI collaboration in research.

Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science

Hugging Face Daily Papers

This position paper argues that interactive AI evaluation should be treated as a design science paradigm, proposing a two-axis taxonomy and reporting standards for assessing dynamic system behavior through trajectories.