Comparing Socio-technical Design Principles with Guidelines for Human-centered AI
Summary
This paper compares socio-technical design principles with guidelines for human-centered AI, analyzing their similarities and differences to inform future AI design approaches.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/14/26, 04:20 AM
# Comparing Socio-technical Design Principles with Guidelines for Human-centered AI Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10331](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10331) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
Imperfectly Cooperative Human-AI Interactions: Comparing the Impacts of Human and AI Attributes in Simulated and User Studies
This research paper investigates how human personality traits and AI design characteristics jointly impact human-AI interactions in imperfectly cooperative scenarios using both simulated datasets (2,000 simulations) and human subjects experiments (290 participants). The study finds significant divergences between simulation and real-world interactions, with AI transparency emerging as a critical factor in actual human-AI encounters.
Psychological Competence as a Missing Dimension in AI Evaluation
This paper introduces psychological competence as a missing dimension in AI evaluation, proposing a conceptual framework to assess how AI systems support user cognition, emotional interpretation, and decision-making in human-facing roles.
Position: AI Must Become Planet-Centered, Not Just Human-Centered
This position paper argues that current AI paradigms are insufficient for addressing global systemic risks and proposes Planet-Centered AI (PCAI) as a new design philosophy that treats Earth's interconnected systems as first-class concerns.
AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide
This paper surveys the capabilities and limitations of AI across the full research lifecycle, from idea generation to dissemination, identifying a sharp boundary between reliable assistance and unreliable autonomy. It provides a taxonomy, benchmark suite, tool inventory, and design principles for human-governed AI collaboration in research.
Interactive Evaluation Requires a Design Science
This position paper argues that interactive AI evaluation should be treated as a design science paradigm, proposing a two-axis taxonomy and reporting standards for assessing dynamic system behavior through trajectories.