Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next too trigger happy or is it just me?
Summary
A developer evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for coding and a voice-agent use case reports it is overly eager to act, running excessive tool calls and taking actions (like creating GitHub issues) when only analysis was requested. They compare it to DeepSeek v4 flash models and note MiMo-V2.6-Flash-MOPD behaves more sensibly as a coding agent.
Similar Articles
@QuixiAI: My experience with Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is that it can't even keep track of a multi-turn conversation. It answers questio…
Users report issues with Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, such as poor multi-turn conversation tracking, compared to the better-performing Qwen3.8-27B.
Please tell me Qwen3.8-Flash-Next can be made to be better than this
A user shares frustration with Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's verbose, meandering responses on general research questions when run locally via llama.cpp, questioning whether the model can be improved beyond coding tasks.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen has released Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, an open-weights multimodal MoE model with 125B tokens but only 6B active parameters, providing a performance boost and serving as an early preview of the Qwen4 architecture.
Are you running Qwen 3.8 27b or Qwen Flash Next?
The user discusses preferences between Qwen 3.8 27b and Qwen Flash Next models on Apple hardware, comparing speeds, and inquires about improving performance with MLX and harnesses without reasoning.
Is it just me or is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next ... really buggy?
A user questions if others have noticed hallucinations and weird reasoning with the Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model on Mac, reporting issues with AppImage installation and tensor metadata from HuggingFace despite high quantization levels.