AI agents are starting to do real work. But where’s the receipt?

I’ve been researching a problem I keep running into: AI agents are getting better at doing real work - researching, writing, planning, replying, summarizing, updating docs, preparing client work, etc. But once an agent does something, the next problem is: How do I know what it actually did, what it used, what it assumed, and whether I can safely hand the result to a client, boss, or teammate? This feels especially important now because agentic AI is moving from developer tools into normal work. OpenAI’s planned acquisition of Ona also seems to point in that direction: better environments for agents to run longer tasks. But even if agents get better execution environments, normal users still need a way to trust and review the work afterward. The problem I’m seeing is not “agents can’t act.”. It’s: agents can act, but their work is still hard to inspect, trust, explain, and hand off. Now I‘m validating an idea. It would turn agent-completed work into a shareable “work receipt”: ▪️what the agent was asked to do ▪️what steps it took ▪️which sources, files, or inputs it used ▪️key claims and assumptions ▪️what seems verified vs uncertain ▪️what still needs human judgment ▪️a clean handoff link for a client, boss, teammate, or collaborator Not another chatbot. Not another workflow builder. Not another AI dashboard. More like a standard proof page for agent work - so non-technical people can actually use agents with confidence. I’m still validating before building the MVP. Would you use something like this if you had AI agents doing real work for you? If this is a pain you’ve felt too, an upvote or comment would really help me measure interest.