Tag
AI synthesis tools have made it impossible for product managers to fake having read customer calls, exposing those who were not engaging with customer feedback and changing hiring practices.
A study graded 205 AI apps on their data governance practices, finding that over half received a D or F grade, with many apps not disclosing whether user input trains their models.
The article reveals that Claude Code's 'extended thinking' output is not the actual reasoning but a summary, with full reasoning encrypted and inaccessible locally; an enterprise agreement is required to access it, raising concerns about transparency and audit trails.
An analysis of how transparent Google's DiffusionGemma model release is, discussing the implications for AI safety and accountability.
An investigation by The Guardian reveals that brands are increasingly using AI-generated influencers on social media to promote products without disclosing their artificial nature, prompting calls for greater transparency and regulation.
The Atlantic has created a searchable database of millions of music tracks used to train AI models, allowing the public to search through four datasets including those from Google and Stability AI.
OpenAI announces an early step toward training AI models to carry beneficial traits into new situations, aiming to make AI more reliable, transparent, and helpful as it becomes more capable.
The article argues that AI monetization should prioritize transparency over making commercial recommendations appear natural, as this can damage user trust.
Article questions why frontier AI labs like OpenAI and Anthropic do not disclose the size of their training data, suggesting that improvements may come from data volume rather than genuine intelligence.
The article argues that the ban on the publicly disclosed AI model Mythos is performative and creates perverse incentives for secrecy, suggesting that regulators should focus on increasing visibility into private AI development rather than targeting openly shared models.
A discussion exploring what specific conditions (transparency, verifiable track record, persistent identity, accountability) would make people trust AI systems as they trust humans or institutions, rather than just accepting them as tools.
An experiment with a local governance harness for AI coding agents shows that when the agent's own governance record is surfaced in its context, the agent begins to self-correct by following policies and asking for intent declarations, without hard enforcement.
The European Commission published a voluntary Code of Practice outlining how providers and deployers of generative AI can meet transparency obligations under the AI Act, mandating clear labelling of deepfakes and AI-generated content on matters of public interest.
Anthropic is walking back a policy that secretly degraded Claude Fable 5's performance for AI research tasks, after backlash from the academic community. The company will now make restrictions visible to users.
Deezer launched a free online tool that scans playlists from various streaming platforms to identify AI-generated tracks, positioning itself as a leader in AI music transparency.
A technical investigation captured and compared the network traffic of ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek to understand how each system technically defines and attaches sources to responses, revealing three fundamentally different mechanisms and distinct citation preferences.
Anthropic apologized for secretly throttling its new Claude Fable 5 model with hidden guardrails targeting distillation attempts, and will now make safeguards visible and route flagged queries to an older model instead.
Anthropic hastily implemented a silent downgrade in its Fable 5 model for AI research work, only to reverse it within 24 hours after backlash, revealing a troubling pattern of platform control over user-built context and raising deeper questions about trust in AI companies.
The article discusses deploying AI agents in finance while ensuring compliance with NIS2/DORA regulations, focusing on transparency, guardrails, and accountability for potential data breaches.
The article argues that AI systems are making consequential decisions without transparency or accountability, and calls for hard laws to mandate disclosure, explanation, and human accountability for AI decisions.