@jeremyphoward: I feel that the trend towards training models to autonomously go off and try to do everything themselves is anti-human.…
Summary
Jeremy Howard argues against training AI models to autonomously do everything, advocating instead for LLMs that support human learning, creativity, and iterative experimentation.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/26/26, 02:47 AM
@tokumin I feel that the trend towards training models to autonomously go off and try to do everything themselves is anti-human.
We should, IMO, be training LLMs to support humans in their learning, creativity, and iterative experimentation.
Similar Articles
Quoting Jeremy Howard
Jeremy Howard critiques Anthropic's approach to frontier AI safety, arguing that the lab with the top-ranked model should not use it for frontier research to slow self-improvement and prevent power imbalance.
@techwith_ram: https://x.com/techwith_ram/status/2064925285003542820
Explores the shift from human-in-the-loop to autonomous agent loops in AI coding, where agents self-prompt and iterate, discussing both the promise and the hidden costs of reduced human control.
most AI agents being built right now are solving the wrong problem entirely
A perspective arguing that the current focus on AI agent autonomy is misguided; the real bottleneck is trust and lack of human visibility. The next leap will come from better human-in-the-loop design, not smarter models.
Has AI become too "safe" to actually be useful for creative work?
The article argues that overly safe and censored AI models hinder creative exploration, while open models offer more freedom for experimentation.
@leerob: Humans try hard things, fail, learn, and get better through repetition. AI models aren't as different as you might thin…
An explainer on how AI models learn, using the analogy of human learning with practice, coaching, and reinforcement, covering pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning.