DeepSeek 0813 "Pro" vs GLM 5.2 & Kimi K3 π
Summary
A comparison of DeepSeek 0813 'Pro' against GLM 5.2 and Kimi K3, likely covering benchmark performance and capability differences between these AI models.
Similar Articles
Open source battle: GLM vs Kimi vs MiMo vs DeepSeek
This article tests four open-source Chinese AI models β Zhipu GLM 5.1, Moonshot Kimi K2.6, Stepfun MIMO 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V4 Pro β on programming tasks. It finds that GLM leads overall in most tasks but not absolutely; each model has its own strengths and weaknesses.
IS GLM 5.2, Kimi 2.7 still worth it?
A discussion questioning whether older AI models like GLM 5.2 and Kimi 2.7 remain relevant for coding now that newer models such as Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8 Max, and DeepSeek V4 Pro are arriving.
We tested Deepseek v4 flash, GLM 5.2, and Kimi K3 on hard agentic tasks, and DeepSeek just crushed
Composio tested DeepSeek v4 flash, GLM 5.2, and Kimi K3 on hard agentic tasks, finding DeepSeek the fastest and cheapest with roughly the same success rate as the others, while frontier models still lead slightly.
Deepseek, kimi etc..
Mentions of AI models Deepseek and Kimi, possibly discussing recent updates or comparisons.
Less Than a Month: Kimi K3, Qwen3.8, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, GLM-5.3
Multiple leading Chinese AI labs have released new flagship models within the past month, including Kimi K3, Qwen3.8, DeepSeek-V4-Pro, and GLM-5.3, signaling rapid progress in China's AI race.