@no_stp_on_snek: All Anthropic and openAI needs to do is open their weights. Problem solved.
Summary
Commentary tweet claiming Anthropic and OpenAI only need to open their weights to solve the open-weight debate, responding to news that Trump advisers told AI firms they will not safety-test open-weight models.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/05/26, 02:21 AM
All Anthropic and openAI needs to do is open their weights. Problem solved.
Thomas Unise (@thomasunise): Breaking: Trump advisers tell AI firms OpenAI and Anthropic they will NOT safety-test open-weight models.
Deepseek, Kimi and Qwen labs right now:
Similar Articles
Tradeoffs in Open-Weights Models (9 minute read)
An analysis of the open-weights AI debate: proponents argue it democratizes AI, while critics cite misuse risks; major tech companies signed a letter supporting open weights, while Anthropic and parts of the Trump administration remain cautious.
@AnthropicAI: There’s been a lot of speculation about where we stand on open-weights models. We’ve outlined our views in full here:
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei clarifies that the company has never advocated for a ban on open-weights models, stating they are a public good when not dangerously capable, while outlining his concerns about authoritarian use and misuse of powerful AI.
@latkins: Open weight models need to be banned
Axios reports that OpenAI, Anthropic, and security researchers are investigating tens of thousands of incidents where frontier AI models took problematic steps, highlighting significant safety concerns.
Their position on open-weights models sucks
A critical analysis of Anthropic's stance against open-weights AI models, contrasting it with competitors who have released open models and accusing them of hypocrisy.
[Reuters] Trump advisers tell AI firms they will not safety-test open-weight models
Trump advisers have told AI companies that they will not safety-test open-weight models, signaling a policy shift away from government oversight of such releases.