@dair_ai: Nice primer on post-training reasoning data. (bookmark it) This is one of the first primers to pull the scattered post-…
Summary
A comprehensive primer synthesizing over 150 public studies on post-training reasoning data, organizing the field around four key questions about data objects, usefulness, construction, and scaling.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/03/26, 03:53 PM
Nice primer on post-training reasoning data.
(bookmark it)
This is one of the first primers to pull the scattered post-training reasoning-data literature into one place, synthesizing over 150 public studies and system reports that previously lived across dataset papers, RL recipes, reward-model studies, benchmarks, and frontier reports.
It organizes everything around four questions. What data objects exist, what makes them useful, how they are constructed, and how they scale.
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02113
Learn to build effective AI agents in our academy: https://academy.dair.ai
A Primer in Post-Training Reasoning Data: What We Know About How It Works
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02113 View PDF
Abstract:Post-training has become a primary driver of recent progress in large reasoning models, and reasoning data are often the key variable determining whether this stage succeeds. Work on post-training reasoning data has grown rapidly, yet this literature remains scattered across dataset papers, reinforcement-learning recipes, reward-model studies, benchmarks, and frontier system reports. This paper is the first primer to synthesize over 150 key public studies and system reports on post-training reasoning data. We organize the field around four questions: what data objects exist, what makes them useful, how they are constructed, and how they scale. Together, this organization provides an attribution framework for future reasoning-data releases and post-training recipes.
Submission history
From: Yaoming Li [view email] **[v1]**Mon, 1 Jun 2026 11:45:50 UTC (19,442 KB)
Similar Articles
@rohanpaul_ai: A Primer paper about how reasoning models improve after training Shows that better reasoning models depend less on raw …
This primer paper explores how reasoning models improve after training, arguing that effective reasoning data relies more on checkable training evidence than raw data size. It categorizes reasoning data by verification methods and emphasizes preserving messy agent data for learning signals.
GRACE: Gradient-aligned Reasoning Data Curation for Efficient Post-training
GRACE proposes a gradient-aligned method that scores individual reasoning steps to select the most valuable data for post-training, achieving 108.8% of full-data performance with only 20% of the data.
@jiqizhixin: Awesome blog! State of RL for reasoning LLMs https://aweers.de/blog/2026/rl-for-llms/…
A comprehensive blog post reviewing the state of reinforcement learning for reasoning LLMs, covering methods from REINFORCE and PPO to GRPO and beyond, with connections to key models like InstructGPT and DeepSeek-R1.
@dair_ai: https://x.com/dair_ai/status/2053495521243799717
DAIR AI's weekly roundup highlights top research papers including HeavySkill, which improves model performance via internalized parallel reasoning, and Sakana AI's Conductor, which uses RL to optimize agent orchestration. It also covers Meta FAIR's work on self-improving pretraining.
A Very Big Video Reasoning Suite
This paper introduces the Very Big Video Reasoning (VBVR) dataset and benchmark, a large-scale resource with over one million video clips across 200 reasoning tasks, enabling systematic study of spatiotemporal reasoning and showing early signs of emergent generalization.