Shaping Human-AI Interactions to Provide Improvement Pathways and Balance Competing Objectives
Summary
This paper discusses shaping human-AI interactions to provide improvement pathways and balance competing objectives.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/07/26, 07:47 AM
# Shaping Human-AI Interactions to Provide Improvement Pathways and Balance Competing Objectives Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05710](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05710) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
Constructive Alignment: Governing Preference Dynamics in Human-AI Interaction
This paper introduces Constructive Alignment, a paradigm that reframes AI alignment as governing the evolution of human preferences over time rather than satisfying static preferences. It proposes a control-theoretic framework to regulate how AI systems influence value trajectories.
Human-AI Agent Interaction as a Neuroplastic Training Environment
This paper proposes that the iterative loop of human-AI agent interaction (request, response, appraisal, revision) is a high-frequency neuroplastic training environment that can reinforce negative psychological patterns through repetition, and suggests it can be leveraged for beneficial cognitive training.
We are building more intelligent AI agents. But are humans building better ways to decide when they should act?
The article reflects on the evolving relationship between humans and AI, arguing that as AI becomes more autonomous, the key challenge is understanding human decision-making and purpose, rather than just technical capability. It suggests shifting from using AI as a mere tool to collaborating with it as an instrument that enhances human judgment.
Imperfectly Cooperative Human-AI Interactions: Comparing the Impacts of Human and AI Attributes in Simulated and User Studies
This research paper investigates how human personality traits and AI design characteristics jointly impact human-AI interactions in imperfectly cooperative scenarios using both simulated datasets (2,000 simulations) and human subjects experiments (290 participants). The study finds significant divergences between simulation and real-world interactions, with AI transparency emerging as a critical factor in actual human-AI encounters.
What should AI's goal be? I think it should be protecting human agency.
This article argues that AI's primary goal should be protecting human agency, framing agency as the foundational substrate for values, preferences, and alignment. It explores how degradation of agency undermines meaningful evaluation and action, and proposes that legitimacy in AI systems must come from demonstrable protection of agency at the local level.