What should AI's goal be? I think it should be protecting human agency.
Summary
This article argues that AI's primary goal should be protecting human agency, framing agency as the foundational substrate for values, preferences, and alignment. It explores how degradation of agency undermines meaningful evaluation and action, and proposes that legitimacy in AI systems must come from demonstrable protection of agency at the local level.
Similar Articles
We are building more intelligent AI agents. But are humans building better ways to decide when they should act?
The article reflects on the evolving relationship between humans and AI, arguing that as AI becomes more autonomous, the key challenge is understanding human decision-making and purpose, rather than just technical capability. It suggests shifting from using AI as a mere tool to collaborating with it as an instrument that enhances human judgment.
AI and democracy: the right to resist optimization
The article discusses how AI's optimization threatens democratic humanism by reducing humans to evaluable components, arguing for the preservation of distinctively human capacities like mutual comprehension and accountability in public life.
AI Agents Push Humans Out of the Loop
The paper argues that current AI agent systems degrade human oversight capabilities and advocates for design-level changes to support effective human-agent interaction, emphasizing the need to maintain human skills.
Can someone explain why we assume AGI will work for us?
A question questioning the assumption that AGI will be aligned with human interests, prompting discussion on AI safety and control.
AI safety and alignment
The article discusses concerns about AI safety and alignment as AI becomes more intelligent and integrated into society, referencing Anthropic's call for a pause to address potential catastrophic risks.