@Miles_Brundage: This sort of thing is why I think the OAI Foundation should be spending at least $10B this year - philanthropic timesca…
Summary
Miles Brundage argues that the OAI Foundation should increase its spending to at least $10 billion this year because philanthropic timelines do not align with the rapid pace of AI development.
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: This is why I am so critical of Anthropic’s anti-OAI identity and OAI’s recent “Anthropic is authoritarian” BS Neither …
Miles Brundage criticizes the public antagonism between Anthropic and OpenAI, arguing that their anti-each-other stances make meaningful coordination harder and risk justifying corner-cutting in the AI race.
Update on the OpenAI Foundation
OpenAI Foundation announces plans to invest at least $1 billion over the next year across life sciences, disease curing, jobs/economic impact, AI resilience, and community programs, with initial focus on AI applications for Alzheimer's, public health data, and high-mortality diseases.
@Miles_Brundage: + contrary to popular belief it is not that hard to spend lots of $, you just need to be willing to take flak for thing…
Miles Brundage comments on the necessity of willingness to take risks and delegate to scale AI development effectively.
The third wave of American philanthropy (23 minute read)
A napkin math analysis reveals that philanthropic capital from OpenAI and Anthropic could add $37B-$100B per year to US giving, drastically increasing available funds and highlighting a gap in operational capacity to spend it effectively.
Anthropic/OpenAI may be spending more than $1,000 for every $100 you pay them (39 minute read)
An analysis suggesting that AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI may be spending over $1000 for every $100 in revenue, highlighting unsustainable economics in the LLM market.