@snowboat84: The previous article covered the top 75 people in AI (founders, lab directors, Transformer authors, top scholars). This is the second part, with seventy mini-biographies, still divided into four sections. They are not builders of the main models, but they shaped how the public understands AI—Karpathy, 3Blue1Brown, Lex …
Summary
This is the second part of a comprehensive overview of AI personalities, introducing seventy individuals who shaped the public's understanding of AI, including science communicators, open-source tool authors, ethics critics, and business leaders.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/05/26, 04:36 PM
The first part covered the top 75 people in AI (founders, lab leaders, Transformer authors, top scholars). This is the second part, containing 70 short biographies, still divided into four sections. These are not the main model builders, but they shaped how the public understands AI—Karpathy, 3Blue1Brown, and Lex Fridman all belong to this thread.
Tool makers: PyTorch, Keras, HuggingFace, llama.cpp, pandas, NumPy all came from them, holding up the foundation of the entire industry.
Brake-pullers: From Stuart Russell who wrote the standard AI textbook, to Yudkowsky who shouts the loudest about doomsday, to Timnit Gebru who was fired by Google—a group of people who are naturally opposed to the builders, yet neither can do without the other.
Turning AI into money: Shovel sellers Jensen Huang and Lisa Su, the heads of the four giants, VCs writing ten-billion-dollar checks, and the people behind Cursor, Devin, and Midjourney.
After writing these 70 people, three patterns keep recurring: The AI the public knows is shaped by science communicators; the most underestimated are the open-source people—you use them every day but can’t name them; and on this list, the brake-pullers and the accelerator-pushers are crammed together, sometimes even colleagues at the same company.
This is the 67th of my 100 original long-form articles in 100 days.
Similar Articles
@WSInsights: The 'information sources' in the AI circle are just these 30 people. These 30 accounts power the global AI signal. Instead of reading 100 second-hand interpretations, follow 10 first-hand accounts. Skip the 100 hot takes. …
The article curates 30 influential AI accounts across seven dimensions (research, engineering, education, open source, evals, AGI, and global ecosystem), encouraging readers to follow primary sources instead of secondary hot takes.
@Suu766: AI content is growing more and more, but there are actually not many bloggers worth following long-term who consistently produce high-quality content. Let me share a few AI bloggers I've been following. They have different styles, but all are valuable to follow in the long run (in no particular order). 1. @dotey (Teacher Baoyu) A solid one in the Chinese tech circle…
A user recommends several AI bloggers worth following long-term, including Baoyu, Karpathy, Raschka, Willison, Howard, etc., covering AI tools, model principles, and practical experience.
@snowboat84: https://x.com/snowboat84/status/2070656715515932930
This article details the new paradigm of AI for Science (AI4S), from AI as an analysis tool to the transition to scientific agents, explaining autonomy levels, key cases, and future trends.
@CMGS1988: https://x.com/CMGS1988/status/2074488576356876585
The author shares personal insights on the relationship between AI and infrastructure, arguing that while AI amplifies execution capabilities, it cannot replace human judgment on complex trade-offs and organizational issues. The author illustrates this with their own experience developing the cocoon/sandbox project using models like Fable 5.
@Lucy_love_AI: Breaking: Claude's CEO just published a 38-page open letter. Dario Amodei precisely mapped which jobs will survive the AI era. No hype. No doomsaying. Only the coldest, most specific predictions any AI leader has ever made. But on page 29 there's a reasoning framework that turns AI from 'your replacement'...
Claude's CEO Dario Amodei published a 38-page open letter, precisely predicting which jobs will survive the AI era, and providing a reasoning framework that turns AI from a substitute into an advantage. The article also gives 9 Claude prompts based on that methodology.