I ran 4 AI shopping agents through a store full of dark patterns. Here's what they missed.
Summary
The author built a test store with 7 common dark patterns and ran 4 AI shopping agents (ChatGPT, Claude Opus/Sonnet/Haiku 5.5 via Buddy) through it; the top models scored A+ by avoiding deceptive pricing, pre-ticked add-ons, and urgency tricks, with a harder round 2 planned.
Similar Articles
Scanned 5 DTC Brands in 50 Seconds. None of Them Are Ready for AI Shopping Agents.
A static analysis scanner tested five DTC brands and found that despite good structured data, their custom JavaScript (e.g., size pickers using <div> instead of <select>) makes them inaccessible to AI shopping agents, potentially costing $82K–$491K monthly in lost revenue from AI-referred traffic.
ChatGPT Shopping vs Perplexity vs Wizard AI
A user compares ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Wizard AI for shopping recommendations, noting differences in brand diversity and purchasing integration.
We tested how AI agents see our own website. It was humbling.
Fibr AI's founder shares an experiment testing how AI agents like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude perceive their website, finding most sites are built only for humans, and launches a product plus a free checker tool to diagnose AI readability of web pages.
I ran a six-agent AI marketing team for three months. This is what it did.
A case study detailing the operation of a six-agent AI marketing team over three months, achieving 7x organic traffic increase, 30% cost reduction per lead, and a monthly cost of $359 while using Claude models and OpenClaw.
I Tested Every Major AI Agent for a Day. Here’s the Best One
A hands-on WIRED review comparing six major always-on AI agents—Meta's Muse, OpenAI's Dots, Instinct, Anthropic's Claude Duet, Google's Gemini Spark, and xAI's Grok Bot—after a day of testing, highlighting their pricing, strengths, weaknesses, and how far the technology has improved since last year.