I compared all specs of the major GPUs/machines that are being used here, because bandwidth is not everything. Some of ya'll need a reality check.
Summary
The author compares various GPUs for LLM inference, critiquing common benchmarks and emphasizing the importance of prefill performance over generation speed, offering recommendations for different budgets and use cases.
Similar Articles
Ran the same models across Strix Halo, RTX 3090, and RTX 5070 because I wanted my own numbers
The author ran 55 inference benchmark runs across Strix Halo, RTX 3090, and RTX 5070 with multiple backends, revealing that memory bandwidth dominates decode speed, the RTX 5070 beats the 3090 on small models, and reasoning models appear ~5x slower due to hidden reasoning content.
Memory Bandwidth for Local AI Hardware (2026 Edition)
The article breaks down memory bandwidth as the critical metric for local AI hardware performance, comparing current GPUs and unified memory systems from NVIDIA, Apple, AMD, Intel, and others across different performance tiers.
Benchmarks of 20 small LLMs on a 6GB RTX 4050
A detailed benchmark of 20 small LLMs quantized for a 6GB GPU, measuring speed and VRAM usage at various context lengths, with qualitative probing for tool-use and instruction following. The report aims to help users with modest hardware choose models for local, private automation tasks.
Small comparison on full compute performance (Anima) of 5090 (600,475 and 400W) vs 6000 PRO MaxQ (325W), and 6000 PRO WS/SE (600W).
A user benchmarks RTX 5090 and RTX 6000 PRO GPUs for AI diffusion tasks, comparing performance at different power limits and showing tradeoffs between speed and power consumption.
(Rant ;)) Make your benchmarks realistic
A community rant urging realistic AI model benchmarks that account for context size, multimodal features, hardware specifics, and parallel processing, rather than just raw speed.