LIBERO-Industry: Benchmarking Robotic Manipulation under Industrial Process Constraints

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

LIBERO-Industry introduces a benchmark built on LIBERO that translates industrial process constraints—such as product variants, conveyor speed, execution windows, and geometric tolerances—into 216 controllable robot learning tasks, evaluating five generalist robot policies under realistic high-mix, low-volume production conditions.

Industrial manipulation in flexible manufacturing, e.g., high-mix, low-volume (HMLV) electronics assembly, requires robot policies to adapt to changing products and production conditions. Such settings impose industrial process constraints, including product variants, moving material flows, finite execution windows, and tight geometric tolerances. However, existing evaluation frameworks do not systematically capture these constraints when assessing generalist robot policies. To address this gap, we introduce LIBERO-Industry, a novel benchmark built on the widely used robot learning benchmark LIBERO, that translates the aforementioned industrial constraints into controllable task conditions and measurable success criteria. Specifically, LIBERO-Industry comprises three classic task scenarios: Static-to-Dynamic (S2D) loading, Dynamic-to-Static (D2S) unloading, and Dynamic-to-Dynamic (D2D) transfer. The suites contain 216 tasks in total that systematically vary object geometry, conveyor speed, interaction-window duration, and geometric acceptance region size. Extensive experiments across five generalist robot policies (including vision-language-action models and world-action models) show that performance progressively degrades as industrial constraints are introduced and combined. Under a shared fine-tuning and evaluation protocol, the LIBERO-Industry co-training condition achieved higher observed target-transfer completion than the original-LIBERO condition.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/20/26, 07:34 AM

Paper page - LIBERO-Industry: Benchmarking Robotic Manipulation under Industrial Process Constraints

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.16782 Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

LIBERO-Industry introduces a benchmark translating industrial manufacturing constraints into controllable robot learning tasks to evaluate generalist policies under realistic production conditions.

Industrial manipulation in flexible manufacturing, e.g., high-mix, low-volume (HMLV) electronics assembly, requires robot policies to adapt to changing products and production conditions. Such settings impose industrial process constraints, including product variants, moving material flows, finite execution windows, and tight geometric tolerances. However, existing evaluation frameworks do not systematically capture these constraints when assessinggeneralist robot policies. To address this gap, we introduceLIBERO-Industry, a novel benchmark built on the widely used robot learning benchmark LIBERO, that translates the aforementioned industrial constraints into controllable task conditions and measurable success criteria. Specifically,LIBERO-Industrycomprises three classic task scenarios:Static-to-Dynamic(S2D) loading,Dynamic-to-Static(D2S) unloading, andDynamic-to-Dynamic(D2D) transfer. The suites contain 216 tasks in total that systematically vary object geometry,conveyor speed,interaction-window duration, andgeometric acceptance regionsize. Extensive experiments across fivegeneralist robot policies(includingvision-language-action modelsandworld-action models) show that performance progressively degrades as industrial constraints are introduced and combined. Under a shared fine-tuning and evaluation protocol, theLIBERO-Industryco-training condition achieved higher observed target-transfer completion than the original-LIBERO condition.

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub1Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610\.16782

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.16782 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.16782 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.16782 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

RoboLab: A High-Fidelity Simulation Benchmark for Analysis of Task Generalist Policies

Hugging Face Daily Papers

RoboLab is a high-fidelity simulation benchmarking framework for evaluating task-generalist robotic policies, introducing the RoboLab-120 benchmark with 120 tasks across visual, procedural, and relational competency axes. It enables scalable, realistic task generation and systematic analysis of policy behavior under controlled perturbations to assess true generalization capabilities.

little m: An AI Agent for Industrial Process Optimization

arXiv cs.AI

The paper introduces little m, an AI agent for industrial process optimization, and presents IPC-Bench, a multimodal benchmark dataset for evaluating LLMs on formulating mathematical models from industrial specifications.

IndustryBench: Probing the Industrial Knowledge Boundaries of LLMs

Hugging Face Daily Papers

The paper introduces IndustryBench, a benchmark evaluating LLMs on industrial procurement QA in Chinese against national standards, highlighting safety compliance gaps. It reveals that extended reasoning often lowers safety-adjusted scores and reshuffles model rankings when safety violations are considered.