@tylerwince: > the future looks weird, but also familiar. As always, Dan’s insights are well worth reading. The idea that our agenti…
Summary
Dan Shipper argues that AI agents create more human work rather than less, citing his company's growth from 4 to 30 employees since GPT-3. He explains how cheap expert competence drives up demand, a view that resonates with both doomers and accelerationists.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/22/26, 05:54 AM
the future looks weird, but also familiar. As always, Dan’s insights are well worth reading. The idea that our agentic future creates more work, not less, is one I deeply agree with. This is a vision both doomers and accelerationists can get behind. Some of my fave quotes: > If you talk to anyone in the AI industry—or to early adopters outside of it—you’ll hear the same thing we’ve noticed internally: There’s more work to do than ever. > Slop is visible sameness, repeated ad nauseam. > It is obvious how little agency even the best models have if you spend 10 minutes with a toddler.
Dan Shipper 📧 (@danshipper): We’ve automated every single thing we can @every with AI agents.
And yet there’s way more human work to do than ever. We’ve gone from 4 -> 30 human employees since GPT-3.
I wrote a report on the structural reasons: how AI makes expert competence cheap, why that drives up demand
Similar Articles
@Saccc_c: Inspired by the legendary Karpathy’s HackerTube, I built a website called “AnliBili” that brings together high-quality Bilibili videos repeatedly recommended on social media over the past 16 years, helping you cut through the noise! By organizing and categorizing nearly 10 million discussions on Zhihu and Xiaohongshu spanning 16 years, I selected 1,132…
Inspired by Karpathy’s HackerTube, the author used Teamily AI’s multi-agent workflow to build “AnliBili,” a website that curates 1,132 high-quality Bilibili videos repeatedly recommended across nearly 10 million discussions spanning 16 years on Zhihu and Xiaohongshu, helping users cut through information noise.
The Download: controlling AI agents and “Super Intelligence” loyalty tests
MIT Technology Review's daily newsletter covers reverse game theory as a way to control AI agents, Trump's 'Super Intelligence' rebrand as a loyalty test, and how today's US midterms will test AI's political influence.
OpenClaw v2026.10.10 | Chat Details, Advisor and browser split speech
OpenClaw v2026.10.10 发布,带来 Chat Details 侧边面板、可在任务中建议调整方向的 Advisor,以及浏览器 Talk 的分体语音模式,同时包含数百项日常聊天、记忆搜索、自动化与编码代理方面的改进。
Show HN: Bema: Work messaging built for humans
Bema is a new work messaging platform built by founder Ben to address clutter in existing tools, emphasizing asynchronous communication with an optional urgent 'break glass' channel.
If you switched model providers tomorrow, what would your agents forget?
A discussion post highlighting the 'institutional memory problem' for AI agents — learned know-how scattered across vendor-controlled memory features, chat logs, and traces — referencing NeuralTrust's Oct 27 piece and InfoQ's distinction between context, memory, and knowledge, and asking how practitioners store durable, portable agent knowledge.