"I just assumed that it would translate": examining MT risk awareness among healthcare staff with abbreviations as a use case
Summary
This paper examines UK healthcare staff awareness of risks when relying on machine translation (mainly Google Translate) for communicating with patients, using medical abbreviations as a case study via interviews with 21 participants and qualitative analysis of clinical corpus examples translated through Google Translate.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/05/26, 09:57 AM
# "I just assumed that it would translate": examining MT risk awareness among healthcare staff with abbreviations as a use case Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02496](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02496) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.02496) > Abstract:In the UK, public healthcare staff report turning to machine translation \(MT\) \- predominantly Google Translate \(GT\) \- to communicate with patients across language barriers\. Though intended to support their duty of care, potentially uninformed reliance on MT in such contexts could have serious consequences for patient safety\. Research nonetheless remains limited on staff awareness of the possible risks posed by higher\-stakes MT use in general and with patient medical records in particular, most existing literature instead examining its use in interpersonal situations or with patient\-oriented documentation\. Moreover, medical abbreviations are well\-documented as increasing patient risk even monolingually, with outcomes from their misuse and/or misinterpretation ranging from temporary harm to the death of the patient\. Abbreviations were therefore selected as a use case for identifying the potential risks posed by their translation with MT\. Contextualised French and Spanish data examples drawn from authoritative clinical corpora and translated via GT were presented during semi\-structured interviews to 21 healthcare staff participants in diverse roles and specialties\. The results were then subject to qualitative analysis and cross\-analysis\. ## Submission history From: Constantin Orasan \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/73200ab0/2610.02496)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 1 Oct 2026 21:18:43 UTC \(478 KB\)
Similar Articles
Safety That Does Not Transfer: Cross-Lingual Clinical Correctness Drift in Deployable Medical Language Models
This paper investigates cross-lingual clinical correctness drift in medical language models, finding that locally deployable models show significant safety degradation when queried in Hausa compared to English, while frontier models maintain competence, highlighting a critical gap in safety evaluation for low-resource settings.
Do No Harm? Hallucination and Actor-Level Abuse in Web-Deployed Medical Large Language Models
This paper presents a large-scale assessment of medical LLMs, including custom MedGPTs and open-source models, finding 25-30% exhibit low factual accuracy and 33.6-54.3% violate operational thresholds, highlighting systemic safety risks.
An ambiguity taxonomy for evaluating large language model performance on clinical registry abstraction: a multi-site prospective study
This study develops an ambiguity taxonomy to evaluate large language model performance on clinical registry abstraction from unprocessed EMR data, finding that LLM accuracy is significantly lower than human abstractors and declines as task ambiguity increases.
LLMs in the Real World: Evaluating "AI" in Emergency Contexts
This paper examines the deployment of an LLM-based machine translation system for text-to-911 emergency services, highlighting common misconceptions and providing recommendations for stakeholders to ensure safe and effective use of AI in critical contexts.
Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intent
This paper systematically evaluates purpose-driven machine translation using LLMs across 50 languages, finding that explicit instructions significantly improve adaptation quality, particularly for informal domains and larger models, while traditional metrics fail to capture adaptation quality.