“我原以为它会自动翻译”:以缩略语为案例考察医疗从业人员对机器翻译风险的认知
摘要
本文通过访谈21名参与者,并结合对临床语料中经Google Translate翻译实例的定性分析,以医疗缩略语为案例,考察了英国医疗从业人员在依赖机器翻译(主要是Google Translate)与患者沟通时对其中风险的认知情况。
arXiv:2610.02496v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: In the UK, public healthcare staff report turning to machine translation (MT) - predominantly Google Translate (GT) - to communicate with patients across language barriers. Though intended to support their duty of care, potentially uninformed reliance on MT in such contexts could have serious consequences for patient safety. Research nonetheless remains limited on staff awareness of the possible risks posed by higher-stakes MT use in general and with patient medical records in particular, most existing literature instead examining its use in interpersonal situations or with patient-oriented documentation. Moreover, medical abbreviations are well-documented as increasing patient risk even monolingually, with outcomes from their misuse and/or misinterpretation ranging from temporary harm to the death of the patient. Abbreviations were therefore selected as a use case for identifying the potential risks posed by their translation with MT. Contextualised French and Spanish data examples drawn from authoritative clinical corpora and translated via GT were presented during semi-structured interviews to 21 healthcare staff participants in diverse roles and specialties. The results were then subject to qualitative analysis and cross-analysis.
查看缓存全文
缓存时间: 2026/10/05 09:57
# "I just assumed that it would translate": examining MT risk awareness among healthcare staff with abbreviations as a use case Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02496](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02496) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.02496) > Abstract:In the UK, public healthcare staff report turning to machine translation \(MT\) \- predominantly Google Translate \(GT\) \- to communicate with patients across language barriers\. Though intended to support their duty of care, potentially uninformed reliance on MT in such contexts could have serious consequences for patient safety\. Research nonetheless remains limited on staff awareness of the possible risks posed by higher\-stakes MT use in general and with patient medical records in particular, most existing literature instead examining its use in interpersonal situations or with patient\-oriented documentation\. Moreover, medical abbreviations are well\-documented as increasing patient risk even monolingually, with outcomes from their misuse and/or misinterpretation ranging from temporary harm to the death of the patient\. Abbreviations were therefore selected as a use case for identifying the potential risks posed by their translation with MT\. Contextualised French and Spanish data examples drawn from authoritative clinical corpora and translated via GT were presented during semi\-structured interviews to 21 healthcare staff participants in diverse roles and specialties\. The results were then subject to qualitative analysis and cross\-analysis\. ## Submission history From: Constantin Orasan \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/73200ab0/2610.02496)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 1 Oct 2026 21:18:43 UTC \(478 KB\)
相似文章
无法迁移的安全性:可部署医学语言模型中的跨语言临床正确性漂移
本文研究了医学语言模型中的跨语言临床正确性漂移,发现本地可部署模型在用豪萨语查询时相比英语表现出显著的安全退化,而前沿模型保持能力,突显了低资源环境中安全评估的关键差距。
无害原则?网络部署的医疗大语言模型中的幻觉与行为体层级滥用
本文对医疗大语言模型(包括定制MedGPT和开源模型)进行了大规模评估,发现其中25-30%的模型事实准确性较低,33.6-54.3%的模型违反操作阈值,揭示了系统性的安全风险。
一个用于评估大语言模型在临床数据登记抽象中表现的歧义分类体系:一项多中心前瞻性研究
本研究开发了一个歧义分类体系,用于评估大语言模型在从未经处理的电子病历数据中进行临床数据登记抽象时的表现,发现LLM的准确性显著低于人工抽象者,并且随着任务歧义性的增加而下降。
现实世界中的LLM:评估紧急情况下的“AI”
本文探讨了基于LLM的机器翻译系统在文本到911紧急服务中的部署情况,指出了常见的误解,并为利益相关者提供了建议,以确保人工智能在关键场景中的安全有效使用。
超越“致相关人士”:为受众和意图定制机器翻译
本文系统评估了使用大语言模型在50种语言中进行目的驱动的机器翻译,发现明确的指令能显著提升适应质量,尤其是在非正式领域和更大模型中,而传统指标无法捕捉适应质量。