Building llm-driven “ai” still requires domain knowledge
Summary
The article discusses that building LLM-driven AI tools still requires capturing domain knowledge, though it's easier than previous AI generations because knowledge doesn't need to be strictly structured.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/15/26, 02:59 PM
Similar Articles
AI Is a Tool. Using It Well Takes Skill.
A blog post rebutting Rich Hickey's claim that LLMs are automation rather than tools, arguing that wielding AI well takes skill and that anthropomorphic AI vocabulary distorts the real engineering risks.
Domain expertise has always been the real moat
The article argues that agentic AI tools shift the bottleneck from coding ability to domain expertise, making those who can verify correctness in both code and domain the most valuable.
'AI' is Not a Tool
Rich Hickey (creator of Clojure) argues that LLMs are not 'tools' but automation, contending that real tools are wielded with control, feedback, and skill-building, whereas LLM use involves abdicating tasks to a capricious system rather than learning from doing the work yourself.
The broken pieces of knowledge and AI tools
The author argues that AI tools like LLMs are underutilized due to inadequate context and knowledge feeding, and proposes a system with context silos to enhance personalization and accuracy.
@jacobli99: If we are ever to build machines that can operate in new domains like experts, either we must reduce each domain to a s…
Jacob X. Li discusses the need for AI systems to develop expertise autonomously from a corpus of documents, framing this as a challenging form of continual learning.