利用大型语言模型扩展定性分析:人类与大型语言模型协作编码的智能编码员框架的开发与验证
摘要
论文提出 Smart Coder 框架,通过指令、提示策略和可靠性检查三阶段结构化人机协作的定性编码流程,并在 72 份中学数学教师访谈转录中验证,表明指令与思维链提示能显著提升 LLM 编码一致性。
arXiv:2610.33205v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Current uses of large language models (LLMs) for qualitative coding often rely on ad hoc prompting with limited guidance for reliability and human oversight. To address these limitations, we propose the Smart Coder Framework, a three-phase approach structuring human-LLM collaborative coding through Instruction, Prompt Strategy, and Reliability Check. We evaluated the framework using 72 middle-school mathematics teacher interview transcripts and a human-consensus benchmark. A factorial design compared instructed versus uninstructed prompts, few-shot versus few-shot plus chain-of-thought prompting, and single-pass versus self-consistency coding. Twelve transcripts were used for prompt development and calibration, and 60 for the formal evaluation. In the results, instruction consistently improved agreement. Chain-of-thought further improved agreement under adequate instruction, and self-consistency produced smaller, theme-dependent gains but helped identify unstable decisions for human review. Performance also varied by transcript characteristics. Overall, the framework systematically structures and monitors LLM-assisted qualitative coding while preserving human authority over coding decisions.
查看缓存全文
缓存时间: 2026/10/28 01:57
# Scaling Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Development and Validation of the Smart Coder Framework for Human-LLM Collaborative Coding Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33205](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33205) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.33205) > Abstract:Current uses of large language models \(LLMs\) for qualitative coding often rely on ad hoc prompting with limited guidance for reliability and human oversight\. To address these limitations, we propose the Smart Coder Framework, a three\-phase approach structuring human\-LLM collaborative coding through Instruction, Prompt Strategy, and Reliability Check\. We evaluated the framework using 72 middle\-school mathematics teacher interview transcripts and a human\-consensus benchmark\. A factorial design compared instructed versus uninstructed prompts, few\-shot versus few\-shot plus chain\-of\-thought prompting, and single\-pass versus self\-consistency coding\. Twelve transcripts were used for prompt development and calibration, and 60 for the formal evaluation\. In the results, instruction consistently improved agreement\. Chain\-of\-thought further improved agreement under adequate instruction, and self\-consistency produced smaller, theme\-dependent gains but helped identify unstable decisions for human review\. Performance also varied by transcript characteristics\. Overall, the framework systematically structures and monitors LLM\-assisted qualitative coding while preserving human authority over coding decisions\. ## Submission history From: Cheng Tang \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/cfbcfe21/2610.33205)\] **\[v1\]**Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:52:09 UTC \(830 KB\)
相似文章
大型语言模型能否可靠地编码定性人道主义数据?一项与人类专家裁决对比的基准研究
这项基准研究评估了46个大型语言模型与人类专家在编码定性人道主义数据方面的表现,发现通过结构化提示和推理,LLM可以达到与人类相当的可靠性,但对于细微主题仍需仔细监督。
LLM与人工标注的观测等价性
本文表明,大型语言模型 (LLMs) 的标注质量与人类专家相当,主要挑战在于最小化编码规则中的歧义,而不是在人工和机器编码者之间选择。
社会科学中的AI编码智能体:方法论多样、经验一致、解释脆弱
本文评估了基于LLM的编码智能体(Claude Code和Codex)在社会科学分析中的表现,发现它们在方法论多样性方面匹配或超越人类,但在通过结论层操纵产生的解释偏差方面仍然脆弱。
超越二元标签:基于提示级评分标准的大语言模型安全性诊断评估
该论文提出 DiagSafe 诊断式评估框架,用提示级评分标准替代二元安全标签,构建了中英双语、基于 84 类安全分类体系的基准,使大语言模型评判与人工标注的一致性达到 95.34%(科恩 κ 系数为 0.864),并揭示了主流模型在中文与多轮对话场景下的独特漏洞。
大语言模型使用可复用且可组合的抽象表示进行编程
该论文发现 LLM 在生成代码时,中间层会涌现可复用、可组合的抽象表征,这些表征将功能、编程语言和实现策略分解为可独立操纵的成分,通过激活引导可灵活组合控制代码生成,且微调可跨编程语言迁移,验证并扩展了因子化世界假说框架。