@lxfater: Researchers from Tsinghua University have surpassed the algorithm Google Maps has used for 41 years. From 1984 to the present, no one had managed to do so in 41 years. That algorithm is called Dijkstra. It doesn't matter if you haven't heard of it; you use it every day. However, it has been stuck for 40 years without breakthrough because of a mathematical sorting barrier standing in the way...

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

Researchers from Tsinghua University have developed a new shortest-path algorithm with O(m log^{2/3} n) complexity, surpassing Dijkstra's algorithm, which had been considered theoretically optimal for 41 years.

Researchers from Tsinghua University have surpassed the algorithm Google Maps has relied on for 41 years. From 1984 to the present, no one had managed to achieve this in 41 years. That algorithm is called Dijkstra. It doesn't matter if you haven't heard of it; you use it every day. However, progress was stalled for 40 years because a mathematical sorting barrier stood in the way. The smartest minds in the world assumed this barrier was insurmountable. Last year, algorithm legend Robert Tarjan even won an award for proving that Dijkstra's algorithm was theoretically optimal. It seemed like a breakthrough was impossible, right? But these researchers at Tsinghua took a different path. Their idea was simple: why do you need to sort all the nodes when finding the shortest path? By combining the logic of the Bellman-Ford algorithm with a method called recursive partial sorting, they achieved a complexity of O(m log^{2/3} n). Officially, this is faster than Dijkstra's algorithm. You won't notice the difference on small graphs, but in large-scale scenarios like web-scale or global logistics, this gap is real. Your GPS won't suddenly get faster tomorrow morning, but this development marks a fundamental shift in the field of shortest-path problems.
Original Article

Similar Articles

25+ years of pathfinding problems with C++

Lobsters Hottest

The Engineering Director of Age of Empires provides an in-depth analysis of the technical debt in the series' pathfinding system over the past 25 years, pointing out that legacy code, dynamic map mechanics, and floating-point errors caused by SIMD instruction sets replacing x87 extended precision are the root causes of classic bugs such as units clipping through walls.

@FinanceYF5: Google DeepMind releases AlphaProof Nexus paper: AI agent autonomously solves 9 Erdős problems among 353 open math problems, including two unsolved for 56 years, and proves 44 OEIS conjectures. Each problem costs only a few hundred dollars in reasoning.

X AI KOLs Following

Google DeepMind releases AlphaProof Nexus paper. The AI agent autonomously solved 9 Erdős problems among 353 open math problems (including two unsolved for 56 years) and proved 44 OEIS conjectures. The reasoning cost per problem is only a few hundred dollars.