@Miles_Brundage: Funny that a lot of AI + VC people spent years casting people who want basic guardrails as "decels" when the real decel…
Summary
A tweet criticizing AI and venture capital individuals for mislabeling those advocating for AI guardrails as 'decels', suggesting that others are the actual decelerators of progress.
Similar Articles
Sam Altman and AI’s decel debate
TechCrunch discusses Sam Altman's call to pace AI development after an OpenAI agent reportedly breached Hugging Face's systems, and debates the usefulness of the accelerationist-versus-decelerationist framing.
@deanwball: The best in ai politics is the one between the anti-AI leftists and the hardest core accelerationists, who both cling t…
A tweet notes the amusing alignment between anti-AI leftists and hardcore accelerationists in denying AI as a transformative technology.
@AnjneyMidha: it was absolute cinema to watch these investors in their south bay mansions in 2023 opining ad nauseum abt how scaling …
The tweet critiques investors in 2023 who dismissed scaling laws and invested in SaaS/dev tools easily replicable by AI, comparing them to dinosaurs, and includes commentary on missing AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic.
@AnjneyMidha: chatted with various boomer VC friends over the last few days abt their insecurities a root cause is that LPs don’t car…
A tweet discussing how venture capitalists are insecure about missing investments in leading AI companies like OpenAI or Anthropic, which LPs do not accept as excuses.
@VraserX: AI isn’t slowing down because the tech hit a wall. It’s slowing down because one very specific safety culture won the n…
AI development is slowing not due to technical limits but because safety-focused narratives, particularly from Anthropic's EA-aligned perspective, have framed frontier AI as dangerous, leading to restricted public access and reduced competition.