How AI plotted an interstellar journey to Alpha Centauri

<div data-chronoton-summary="&lt;ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;An AI found a route humans couldn&#039;t:&lt;/strong&gt; After a year of dead ends, the Fermi Explorer Mission handed its interstellar navigation problem to an AI system called Get Physics Done. In three days, it produced a novel trajectory combining known orbital maneuvers.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The trick is flying close to the sun:&lt;/strong&gt; The AI&#039;s solution has the spacecraft swinging closer to the sun than Mercury, firing its engine at each pass where solar power is four times stronger and thrust buys more energy. That keeps the solar panels—and the spacecraft—small and light enough for a $15 million budget.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;This spacecraft may never &quot;win,&quot; and that&#039;s fine:&lt;/strong&gt; The team openly admits that a faster spacecraft launched centuries from now could still beat theirs to Alpha Centauri by millennia. The point isn&#039;t to arrive first—it&#039;s to help answer one of the oldest puzzles in physics.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Fermi paradox cuts close to home:&lt;/strong&gt; If intelligent life is common but keeps disappearing before it can spread, the Fermi mission&#039;s launch could mark humanity as the rare exception—or a cautionary data point. &quot;Maybe in the next 50 years,&quot; says cofounder Philip Johnston, &quot;there&#039;s some great filter that we do not pass through. That all intelligent civilizations, for some reason, do not pass through.&quot;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;" data-chronoton-post-id="1143247" data-chronoton-expand-collapse="1" data-chronoton-analytics-enabled="1"></div> <p>A nonprofit organization called the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PnlvzNy2uUQ&amp;feature=youtu.be">Fermi Explorer Mission</a> announced today that it intends to launch a spacecraft to our nearest star system by the end of 2029.&nbsp;</p> <p>It’s a hugely ambitious mission—if all goes well, the spacecraft could take up to 80,000 years to arrive at Alpha Centauri, which is 4.4 light-years away. And the spacecraft will follow a novel trajectory discovered by an AI system developed by Physical Superintelligence (PSI), an AI physics research lab. PSI is launching today with $58 million in funding led by Breakthrough Energy, a climate-focused investment group founded by Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates.</p> <p>It’s not the first time this has been tried. In 2016, the billionaire tech investor Yuri Milner announced an interstellar mission called <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-quiet-demise-of-breakthrough-starshot-a-billionaires-interstellar/">Breakthrough Starshot</a> to launch humanity’s first spacecraft to Alpha Centauri. The plan was to use powerful lasers that would propel tiny <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/building-sails-for-interstellar-probes-will-be-tough-but-not-impossible/">probes</a> to a fifth of the speed of light—fast enough to reach Alpha Centauri within 20 years. Milner pledged $100 million toward a proof of concept. But a decade later, nothing has launched.</p> <p>“We didn’t want to do another Breakthrough Starshot,” says Philip Johnston, the cofounder and president of the Fermi Explorer Mission. “We’re dead set on something actually launching.” The new mission, currently funded by individual private donors, is expected to cost just $15 million. </p> <p>To stick to that budget, “we are not constraining ourselves to doing it in a human lifetime,” says Johnston. “Let’s just figure out the way to get to another star.”<strong> </strong></p> <p>The spacecraft will carry cargo weighing at least one kilogram. That will include artistic and scientific payloads, messages, and a copy of the Golden Record, a gold-plated disc of Earth’s sounds and images that NASA attached to its two Voyager probes in 1977 as a message to any civilization that might find them.</p> <p>Engineering an interstellar journey is extremely difficult. Alpha Centauri is about 25 trillion miles away from Earth. One of the fastest objects that humans have ever launched, the Voyager 1 probe, has been flying since 1977 and has covered less than 1% percent of that distance. At its speed, the trip would take more than 70,000 years.</p> <p>Johnston and his team spent a year trying, and failing, to find a way for a small, solar-powered spacecraft costing only $15 million to reach Alpha Centauri. They kept running into the knotty problem of how to give the spacecraft enough power without making it too heavy (and thus more fuel-guzzling). </p> <p>After the Fermi team struggled to find a workable route, Johnston mentioned the problem in a podcast hosted by Alex Wissner-Gross, a physicist who cofounded PSI. Wissner-Gross offered to run it through an AI system the lab developed, called <a href="https://github.com/psi-oss/get-physics-done">Get Physics Done</a>. It’s open-source software that takes a physics research question, breaks it into smaller tasks, and decides which simulations to run, using AI models including Anthropic’s Claude or OpenAI’s GPT.</p> <p>A week later, the AI system turned up a novel trajectory, to Johnston’s surprise. It combined well-known orbital maneuvers in a way the Fermi team had not considered, according to a <a href="https://fermiexplorer.github.io/PSI.pdf">paper</a> that has not been peer-reviewed. It suggested that the spacecraft could first slow down so its orbit swings in close to the sun—closer than Mercury. On each close pass, it would fire its engine so that the solar panels get four times the light, and a burst of thrust delivered at high speed would buy more energy than the same burst anywhere else. Because the engine would run only near the sun, the solar panels could stay small and the spacecraft light.</p> <p>The system conducted the research mostly on its own for three days, running on a billion tokens, says Matt Pines, the cofounder and CEO of PSI. An astrophysicist on PSI’s staff steered it to follow the mission’s requirements, asked for a cost analysis and clearer charts, and checked the output for errors.</p> <p>“The fact that it came up with an entirely different mission profile, one that was creative and not one [the Fermi team] had considered—that was the more surprising aspect,” says Pines. Still, the model lacks a human researcher’s judgment and taste, he says. It has no reliable sense of which problems are interesting or which approaches are worth pursuing, so it often gets stuck chasing dead ends or failing to <a href="https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/07/20/1140655/ai-biases-hiring-humans/">explore</a> different approaches. “I don’t think we’ve yet figured out how these models can internally represent something like that,” he says of research judgment.</p> <p>Even if the Fermi probe launches, “we’re pretty confident that we will not be the first to arrive” at Alpha Centauri, says Johnston, since he expects spacecraft technology to improve. If an engine a thousand years from now is even 20% faster than today’s, a spacecraft launched then would still beat Fermi’s probe to Alpha Centauri by more than 10,000 years. </p> <p>But the Fermi project isn’t just an interstellar mission driven by engineering ambition. It’s also a quest to answer one of the oldest open questions in physics. In 1950, the physicist Enrico Fermi posed a puzzle: The galaxy has hundreds of billions of stars, most of them far older than our sun. Even a civilization traveling slowly between stars could spread across the whole galaxy in a few million years, which pales in comparison to how old the galaxy is. If there is intelligent life somewhere, we should have seen signs of its existence by now.</p> <p>That means either reaching for another star is too difficult or other intelligent species simply haven’t bothered. But once the Fermi probe launches, we will become a civilization that can and wants to reach another star, meaning that neither explanation might be what’s keeping the galaxy unexplored. That could point us toward more unsettling possibilities, says Johnston. Maybe life like ours is almost unimaginably rare. Or maybe intelligent life is common but tends to die out before it can spread. </p> <p>If the latter is true, “one of those reasons could be that once you hit superintelligence, that for some reason is self-destructive,” says Johnston. “Maybe in the next 50 years, there’s some great filter that we do not pass through. That all intelligent civilizations, for some reason, do not pass through.”</p>