@GergelyOrosz: Hard to believe but there was a time when smoking was promoted to be healthy / harmless, even, pregnant women encourage…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

The tweet compares the historical promotion of smoking as harmless to the current uncertainty about AI's impact on knowledge work, suggesting it may take decades to understand AI's effects.

Hard to believe but there was a time when smoking was promoted to be healthy / harmless, even, pregnant women encouraged to smoke, 1920s-1950s. Took ~30 years (!!) to figure out how harmful it was. How long will it take to figure out the impact of AI: how harmless, helpful or harmful is using AI all day for eg knowlege work?
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/21/26, 09:14 PM

Hard to believe but there was a time when smoking was promoted to be healthy / harmless, even, pregnant women encouraged to smoke, 1920s-1950s. Took ~30 years (!!) to figure out how harmful it was.

How long will it take to figure out the impact of AI: how harmless, helpful or harmful is using AI all day for eg knowlege work?

Similar Articles

We are in the gaslighting phase of AI adoption

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

The article argues that companies are exaggerating AI maturity, offloading risks to workers, and gaslighting employees into ignoring real problems like hallucinations and fragile workflows.

Hating AI in 2026

Lobsters Hottest

A critical reflection on the AI industry's environmental costs and overhyped claims about chatbot capabilities, arguing that many harms are ignored and that not using AI remains an easy choice.