@Miles_Brundage: (context here is that "AI safety people" are, as a general matter, very pro technology + much more on board with the tr…
Summary
The tweet suggests that AI safety advocates are generally more pro-technology and supportive of transhumanist and post-work futures compared to the general public.
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: Wow!
Miles Brundage expresses excitement about a linked article, likely related to AI safety or policy.
@kevinnbass: AI Safety People: We need to make sure AI is aligned with humanity. Also AI Safety People: I practice polyamory with my…
A tweet criticizing AI safety advocates for their personal practices that appear to conflict with their goals of aligning AI with humanity.
The AI safety debate has a framing issue: nobody is actually arguing against safety
This Substack post argues the AI safety debate is misframed as a divide between defenders and critics, when really everyone wants safety but disagrees on who is protected, from what risks, and at what cost. It references Dario Amodei's declaration, Anthropic's moves, and calls for more intelligence and wisdom in the discussion.
@Miles_Brundage: I'm glad to see conservative groups more engaged on AI safety lately in sometimes helpful ways, but I don't think this …
Miles Brundage comments on a policy position from conservative groups urging Trump to vet AI before release.
@Miles_Brundage: Concerning
A tweet by AI safety researcher Miles Brundage expressing concern about a topic, shared via a link.