@kevinnbass: AI Safety People: We need to make sure AI is aligned with humanity. Also AI Safety People: I practice polyamory with my…
Summary
A tweet criticizing AI safety advocates for their personal practices that appear to conflict with their goals of aligning AI with humanity.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/29/26, 05:49 AM
AI Safety People: We need to make sure AI is aligned with humanity.
Also AI Safety People: I practice polyamory with my polycue, publicly promote orgies and prostitution, advocate for the lives of shrimps over humans, and have no children.
Similar Articles
@Miles_Brundage: (context here is that "AI safety people" are, as a general matter, very pro technology + much more on board with the tr…
The tweet suggests that AI safety advocates are generally more pro-technology and supportive of transhumanist and post-work futures compared to the general public.
AI safety and alignment
The article discusses concerns about AI safety and alignment as AI becomes more intelligent and integrated into society, referencing Anthropic's call for a pause to address potential catastrophic risks.
AI safety needs social scientists
OpenAI argues that AI safety research on value alignment requires social scientists to help address how human cognitive biases and inconsistencies affect the data used to train AI systems. The organization proposes human-only experiments as a method to uncover alignment problems before deploying machine learning solutions.
@d0nutptr: I’ve found a lot of the discussion on twitter about ai safety frustrating to read (I’ve been biting my tongue so hard),…
A Twitter user shares an article that addresses misconceptions in AI safety discussions, noting frustration with ongoing debates.
Anthropic Has Some Alignment Problems (23 minute read)
The article discusses Anthropic's internal alignment challenges, including pausing high-risk RL efforts and creating reward-seeking AI models, alongside industry concerns about chain of thought monitorability in AI systems like OpenAI's Astra.