@swyx: ## On Loopcraft One might argue the entire game of the next century is to be able to stack loops as effectively as poss…
Summary
A conceptual discussion on the importance of stacking loops in AI agent design, drawing parallels to Sutton's Bitter Lesson and advocating for scalable systems over manual fixes.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/12/26, 08:59 AM
On Loopcraft
One might argue the entire game of the next century is to be able to stack loops as effectively as possible.
In the early days of each phase, it will be valuable to know when to go DOWN a loop when things go wrong (for reliability)…
but it will probably be more valuable to know how to go UP a loop as models improve (for leverage).
If you don’t figure out how to do this, don’t be salty when you lose to those that do.
Latent.Space (@latentspacepod): [AINews] Loopcraft: The Art of Stacking Loops
@RichardSSutton has his “Bitter Lesson” for models. We now have the Salty Lesson for agents:
Don’t fix things yourself, as you have done historically.
Instead focus on systems that scale with more agents, like goals and
Similar Articles
@akshay_pachaar: about loop engineering. everyone's saying the same thing this week. you don't prompt agents anymore, you design loops t…
The post discusses loop engineering for AI agents and introduces Opik, an open-source tool from Comet ML that provides debugging, evaluation, and optimization for generative AI applications, with a focus on automating failure handling and building regression tests from real failures.
@mvanhorn: https://x.com/mvanhorn/status/2063865685558903149
The article explains the concept of 'loops' in AI coding, where developers write programs that prompt coding agents instead of manually prompting, as popularized by Peter Steinberger and Boris Cherny, and discusses how this shift represents a new abstraction layer in AI-assisted development.
@cellinlab: https://x.com/cellinlab/status/2064144608242679822
This article introduces the concept of Loop Engineering — instead of directly writing prompts for AI agents, it designs a system (loop) that recursively lets the agent iterate on tasks until completion. The article provides a detailed comparison of how Claude Code and Codex implement five building blocks: automations, worktrees, skills, sub-agents, etc. It suggests this could be the future trend of collaborating with coding agents, but also warns about token costs and AI slop issues.
@0xCodez: https://x.com/0xCodez/status/2064374643729773029
A 14-step roadmap on loop engineering, guiding developers from manually prompting AI coding agents to designing automated systems that handle the prompting, verification, and iteration themselves.
@rohit4verse: Building dumb AI Loops that ship is the current MOAT in Agentic systems. 88% of agent pilots ship this exact pattern an…
The article discusses common failure patterns in agentic AI systems, specifically 'dumb AI loops,' citing issues like state poisoning and data leaks observed in Claude Code deployments.