GM will pay $220 million to settle claims from 35 states and Washington, DC that it sold customers' Smart Driver telematics data to insurance brokers, with a third party required to verify future privacy compliance.
<p>General Motors marketed its Smart Driver system as <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/05/buicks-smart-driver-explains-why-my-gas-mileage-sucks-and-my-editors-doesnt/">a way for parents to monitor teen drivers</a> or for adults to track their driving behavior. But in 2024, it emerged that GM had been sharing that data with brokers. <a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/03/car-makers-shady-data-sharing-takes-spotlight-in-gm-connected-car-scandal/">Those brokers then sold the data to insurance companies</a>, and some drivers found that their insurance became more expensive as a result. To make matters worse, many of those drivers claimed they had no knowledge of ever agreeing to share such data for such purposes.</p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/01/gm-faces-ban-on-selling-driver-data-that-can-be-used-to-raise-insurance-rates/">Last year</a>, GM and its OnStar subsidiary entered into a settlement with the FTC, prohibiting them from sharing some kinds of driver data with third parties. The settlement was finalized this January. That agreement banned the two companies from sharing geolocation data or driver behavior data for five years. At the time, GM also discontinued Smart Driver across its entire range.</p>
<p>Now the automaker has reached terms with the District of Columbia and 35 states after their attorneys general joined together to sue GM as well.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/10/gm-to-pay-220-million-after-selling-customer-smart-driver-data/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/10/gm-to-pay-220-million-after-selling-customer-smart-driver-data/#comments">Comments</a></p>
# GM to pay $220 million after selling customer Smart Driver data
Source: [https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/10/gm-to-pay-220-million-after-selling-customer-smart-driver-data/](https://arstechnica.com/cars/2026/10/gm-to-pay-220-million-after-selling-customer-smart-driver-data/)
General Motors marketed its Smart Driver system as[a way for parents to monitor teen drivers](https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/05/buicks-smart-driver-explains-why-my-gas-mileage-sucks-and-my-editors-doesnt/)or for adults to track their driving behavior\. But in 2024, it emerged that GM had been sharing that data with brokers\.[Those brokers then sold the data to insurance companies](https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/03/car-makers-shady-data-sharing-takes-spotlight-in-gm-connected-car-scandal/), and some drivers found that their insurance became more expensive as a result\. To make matters worse, many of those drivers claimed they had no knowledge of ever agreeing to share such data for such purposes\.
[Last year](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/01/gm-faces-ban-on-selling-driver-data-that-can-be-used-to-raise-insurance-rates/), GM and its OnStar subsidiary entered into a settlement with the FTC, prohibiting them from sharing some kinds of driver data with third parties\. The settlement was finalized this January\. That agreement banned the two companies from sharing geolocation data or driver behavior data for five years\. At the time, GM also discontinued Smart Driver across its entire range\.
Now the automaker has reached terms with the District of Columbia and 35 states after their attorneys general joined together to sue GM as well\.
GM told[Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/gm-pay-220-million-settle-allegations-it-violated-consumers-privacy-2026-10-29/)in a statement that “\[s\]afer, more helpful and personalized experiences are enabled by connected vehicle data, and GM is committed to being clear about what information is used, how it’s protected, and the choices customers have about what they share\.”
[According to TechCrunch](https://techcrunch.com/2026/10/29/gm-reaches-220m-settlement-over-selling-drivers-private-data/), the settlement with the states is notable in that it doesn’t take GM’s word that it’s complying with the privacy policy—a third party will be required to make that determination\.
General Motors agreed to pay $220 million to settle claims from 36 US attorneys general that it illegally sold driver location and driving-habit data to data brokers, potentially leading to higher insurance premiums. GM must now limit data collection and obtain express consent from drivers.
Automakers like General Motors collect and sell customer driving data without clear consent, leading to FTC penalties and highlighting widespread privacy issues in the automotive industry.
Cox Media Group (CMG) agreed to pay $880,000 to settle FTC allegations that it falsely advertised an AI-powered 'Active Listening' service that supposedly listened to consumers' devices for ad targeting, when in fact it did not use voice data at all.
The federal government is expanding a safety investigation into over 1.1 million General Motors vehicles due to brake failures in the eBoost system, following hundreds of reports and safety incidents.
GM at its Onward event outlined an AI-driven transformation plan, promising halved vehicle development cycles, 40x more powerful compute units, next-gen LMR batteries, and eyes-off autonomous driving for its trucks and SUVs to compete with Chinese automakers.