I let the agent test its own model upgrade instead of trusting the release notes. It found 3 things throttling itself
Summary
A developer describes letting their AI agent autonomously test its own model upgrade by running controlled probes and measuring performance, revealing issues that throttled itself.
Similar Articles
A month of running agents on a cron in production: four things that broke, none of them the model's fault
The author shares four mechanical failures experienced while running AI agents on a cron job in production for a month, emphasizing that all issues stemmed from setup problems rather than model deficiencies.
It's impossible to test your own agent. I tried and failed.
A developer's personal account of the difficulty in objectively evaluating their own AI agent's performance, highlighting the pitfalls of self-testing and the value of unexpected, real-world benchmarks.
AI agent hit a bug it had predicted 20 minutes earlier-in its own self-written code
A custom AI agent autonomously built a tool, audited its own code, predicted a bug, encountered it later, and recovered by adapting its approach, showcasing advanced self-improvement capabilities.
I ran the same prompt against our agent every week for a quarter and watched the answers drift until they broke our policy [D]
The author describes running weekly audits on a production AI agent, observing that its responses gradually drifted and eventually violated policy without model updates, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring in real-world AI deployments.
I gave a local AI agent system file access and a mechanical "suffering" metric. Scaling the model changed its behavior entirely
The author shares a local multi-agent system called hollow-agentOS that uses a 'suffering' metric to autonomously generate, sandbox, and hot-load tools. Scaling the model to Qwen 3.6 35B significantly improved system stability and self-correction capabilities, achieving a high success rate in code generation.