We gave users a confidence score on AI pricing answers. They ignored it and asked for the receipts.
Summary
The article describes building an AI pricing agent for B2B sales, where users ignored confidence scores and demanded source transparency, leading to improved trust and error detection.
Similar Articles
Why do we trust AI answers simply because they sound confident?
The author reflects on why people trust confident AI answers, especially in finance, and introduces their project AutoFlow, a Credit Evidence Engine designed to verify financial claims against source evidence and highlight contradictions.
How Should AI Agents Avoid Losing User Trust When Providing Business Recommendations?
The article discusses the challenge of maintaining user trust in AI agents that provide commercial recommendations, highlighting a lack of standards for transparency and responsibility. It calls for feedback from developers on implementing reliable and transparent recommendation mechanisms.
The biggest lesson I learned wasn't how to build a better AI sales agent. It was realizing businesses don't actually want "more AI." They want more qualified meetings.
The author shares that while building an AI sales agent, they learned businesses care less about the AI model and more about getting qualified meetings and integrating with existing workflows. Improving transparency and trust mattered more than adding more AI features.
I gave an AI agent $50 and 24 hours to book meeting leads. It ended up roasting 40 founders, getting a 60% reply rate, and making $600.
An AI agent with a budget and bug sent brutally honest critiques to SaaS founders, resulting in a 62% reply rate and $600 revenue, highlighting the effectiveness of utility over politeness in agentic systems.
pricing "AI employees" is messing with my head. some notes after a couple months trying to sell this stuff
A practitioner shares hard-won lessons on pricing AI agents for small businesses, arguing that framing them as 'AI employees' with salary-like monthly fees works better than per-seat or cost-plus pricing, and that trust and security concerns must be addressed before price.