Agentic Artifact Creation: Systems, Evaluation, Principles, and Opportunities
Summary
This survey defines agentic artifact creation as stateful, feedback-driven construction of deliverables by AI systems and analyzes 259 works to propose principles for accountable control.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/01/26, 12:05 PM
Paper page - Agentic Artifact Creation: Systems, Evaluation, Principles, and Opportunities
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.28122 Published on Aug 28
#3 Paper of the day Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
This survey defines agentic artifact creation as stateful, feedback-driven construction of deliverables by AI systems and analyzes 259 works across artifact families, settings, and evaluation practices to propose principles for accountable control.
Generative modelscan turn natural-language prompts into images, text, code, and other content, lowering the cost of producing drafts and components. Their practical impact increasingly depends on whether those pieces can become complete, dependable deliverables. This survey examines agentic artifact creation, which we define as stateful construction in which an AI system materially constructs or revises a deliverable and intermediate observations redirect later work. Functionally, the process links an operational representation of the artifact, a construction policy, and runtime verification whose feedback can redirect later actions. We reviewed 259 works available through August 20, 2026: 230 systems meeting this definition and 29 benchmarks of agentic artifact construction. We compare six artifact families, then analyze application settings and evaluation practice as separate dimensions. Across families, construction challenges reflect not only modality but also how tightly decisions are coupled and whether failures become visible while they remain repairable. Decomposition can reduce local complexity while increasing coordination and reassembly costs. Learned judges may add little independent evidence when they share the generator’s preferences or blind spots. We formulate principles for keeping commitments and responsibility explicit, turning feedback into targeted repair, and revalidating affected state after change. We also identify opportunities for sustaining coherent, accountable control as artifacts, creator intent, and construction systems evolve. A curated paper list is available at https://github.com/GeminiLight/awesome-agentic-artifact-creation.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub14Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608\.28122
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.28122 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.28122 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.28122 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper3
Similar Articles
Most “agentic AI” conversations feel too abstract. Here is how my agentic research system looks like
The author shares a practical breakdown of an agentic research system they built to identify and evaluate AI use cases within companies. The system uses six agents for discovery, evaluation, and context extraction, emphasizing human-in-the-loop decision-making over full autonomy.
Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems
This survey proposes a trustworthiness model for agentic AI in critical engineering systems, covering safety, robustness, transparency, accountability, and security across domains like power systems and autonomous vehicles.
Emergence of Agentic AI: A Review on Evolution, Background, Working Principles, Applications, Adoption Factors, and Future Research Directions
This paper provides a systematic review of Agentic AI, discussing its historical evolution, architecture, applications, challenges, and future research directions.
Agentic operating systems will need an audit layer beneath the AI
The post explores the potential design of agentic operating systems, where users describe outcomes rather than directly interacting with programs, and raises concerns about trust, privacy, opaque decision-making, and vendor lock-in.
Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
This survey provides a comprehensive examination of trustworthy agentic AI, focusing on safety, robustness, privacy, and system security. It clarifies key concepts, identifies risks along the agent workflow, summarizes mitigation strategies, and consolidates evaluation metrics and benchmarks, aiming to serve as a practical reference for deploying agentic AI in high-stakes environments.