AI Rankings
Summary
This article presents a ranking of AI models based on adjusted scores from Scale Labs' SEAL testing, with Fable-5.1 leading the list.
These rankings are done by calculating an overall score from Scale Labs' SEAL testing for AIs then calculating an adjusted score to prevent AIs tested in only one category to have a high ranking. Rank Model Adjusted Score Raw Avg Score # Categories 1 Fable-5.1 77.51 94.99 9 2 Muse Spark 1.1 76.99 91.11 11 3 Fable-5 72.65 87.98 9 4 GPT-5.4-pro 70.30 91.72 6 5 Muse Spark 68.14 78.13 12 6 Opus 5 66.25 94.34 4 7 GPT-5-pro 65.73 81.48 7 8 GPT-5.4 61.88 68.65 14 9 Claude Opus 4.6 61.66 66.88 18 10 Inkling 61.06 91.58 3 11 Inkling-small 60.91 91.24 3 12 GPT-5.6-Sol 60.51 73.28 7 13 Gemini 3.1 Pro 58.76 63.33 18 14 GPT-5.5 58.63 68.87 8 15 Claude Opus 4.5 57.95 64.04 13 16 Claude Opus 4.8 57.30 65.80 9 17 Gemini 3 Pro 56.08 60.30 17 18 GPT-Realtime-2 55.89 91.35 2 19 Claude Opus 4.7 55.79 67.53 6 20 GPT-5.1 55.43 63.10 9 21 o3 55.14 61.31 11 22 GPT-5 53.59 58.73 12 23 GLM 5.2 53.57 63.85 6 24 o3-pro 53.25 63.30 6 25 TML-Interaction-Small 51.94 79.48 2 26 GPT-5.2 49.80 53.68 12 27 Claude Sonnet 5 49.45 94.58 1 28 Gemini 3.5 Flash 48.82 59.48 4 29 GPT-5.2-pro 48.34 68.70 2 30 Kimi K3 48.11 87.89 1 31 Claude Sonnet 4.5 47.80 50.77 13 32 GPT-5-mini 47.58 53.85 6 33 Qwen2.5-32B 46.91 81.90 1 34 Gemini 3.1 Flash Live 46.26 62.45 2 35 GPT-OSS-120B 45.55 49.24 8 36 GLM 5.1 45.31 73.90 1 37 Kimi K2-Thinking 45.10 54.34 3 38 Claude Opus 4 45.07 49.67 6 39 GPT-5.2-codex 44.82 58.14 2 40 GPT-Realtime-1.5 44.49 52.93 3 41 Claude 3 Opus 44.12 67.93 1 42 Claude Opus 4.1 44.10 46.26 11 43 GPT-5.3 44.07 51.95 3 44 Claude Sonnet 4 43.88 46.17 10 45 Claude 3.5 Haiku 43.83 66.49 1 46 Kimi K2.5 43.06 44.84 11 47 Qwen3 Coder 480B-A35B 42.93 61.99 1 48 o4-mini 42.65 44.29 11 49 GPT-OSS-20B 42.53 46.89 4 50 MiniMax 2.1 42.30 58.84 1 51 Mistral Medium (latest) 41.73 48.85 2 52 o3-mini 41.51 44.19 5 53 Llama 3.1 405B 40.76 44.23 3 54 Gemini 2.5 Flash 40.35 41.80 6 55 Claude Sonnet 4.6 39.99 41.46 5 56 Kimi K2.7 Code 39.21 43.40 1 57 Llama 3.1 70B 38.80 40.06 2 58 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 38.58 38.99 4 59 GPT-4o mini 38.49 39.79 1 60 GLM 4.7 38.01 37.37 1 61 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 37.86 37.66 6 62 Gemini 1.5 Flash 37.72 35.95 1 63 GPT-4.1 nano 37.58 35.26 1 64 Gemini 2.5 Pro 37.46 37.27 15 65 GPT-5.4-mini 37.42 34.45 1 66 Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct 37.15 35.11 2 67 Voxtral-Small-24B 36.80 34.08 2 68 o1 36.40 34.63 4 69 Gemini 3.7 Flash 36.10 27.86 1 70 GPT-4o-Audio-Preview 36.08 33.30 3 71 Mixtral 8x22B 36.07 27.71 1 72 Grok-4.20 36.01 27.41 1 73 Claude Haiku 4.5 36.00 33.11 3 74 Qwen 2.5 72B 35.96 27.15 1 75 Mistral Magistral 35.77 26.17 1 76 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 35.74 30.90 2 77 Kimi-k2.6 35.55 25.08 1 78 Llama 3.3 70B 35.49 31.92 3 79 DeepSeek V3.2 35.22 23.42 1 80 Qwen 3.7 Max 35.05 22.57 1 81 Qwen3-32B 35.03 22.50 1 82 Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio Preview 34.91 28.39 2 83 Gemini 3 Flash 34.88 32.69 6 84 Llama 3.2 90B Vision 34.86 21.66 1 85 Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental (Mar 2025) 34.65 29.95 3 86 Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May 2025) 34.48 27.12 2 87 Gemma 3 27B 33.82 16.45 1 88 GPT-Realtime 33.79 27.96 3 89 DeepSeek V4 Pro 33.64 27.61 3 90 DeepSeek R1-0528 33.33 29.47 5 91 Manus 1.6 33.32 13.96 1 92 GLM 4.6 33.25 13.60 1 93 Gemini 2.0 Pro Experimental 32.86 11.64 1 94 Gemini 2.5 Flash (Apr 2025) 32.81 22.09 2 95 Manus 1.5 32.76 11.16 1 96 Manus 1.0 32.76 11.16 1 97 Mistral Large 2411 32.44 9.52 1 98 GLM 5 32.35 24.61 3 99 MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct 31.99 19.64 2 100 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 31.95 28.41 7 101 Qwen3-8B 31.64 5.55 1 102 Nova Micro 31.46 4.65 1 103 ChatGPT agent 31.09 2.81 1 104 Kimi K2-Instruct 30.94 26.82 7 105 Nova Premier 30.80 1.36 1 106 Llama 4 Scout 30.61 0.39 1 107 Codestral 2405 30.53 0.00 1 108 GPT-5.3-codex 30.53 0.00 1 109 MiniMax M3 30.53 0.00 1 110 DeepSeek V3.1 30.39 25.95 7 111 o1 Pro 30.37 19.98 3 112 Qwen3-235B-A22B 30.21 26.68 9 113 DeepSeek V3 29.18 17.19 3 114 GPT-4.1-mini 28.97 19.77 4 115 Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview (May 2025) 28.95 16.66 3 116 Phi-4-multimodal 28.95 10.51 2 117 Gemma 3n E4B 28.95 10.51 2 118 Llama 3.1 8B 28.48 9.12 2 119 GLM 4.5 28.36 20.51 5 120 DeepSeek R1 27.73 17.30 4 121 GPT-4.5 Preview 27.65 13.64 3 122 Gemini 1.5 Pro 27.56 13.43 3 123 GPT-Realtime-mini 27.19 12.56 3 124 Nova Pro 26.82 4.14 2 125 Qwen2.5-Omni-7B 26.38 2.81 2 126 Nova Lite 26.33 2.65 2 127 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking 26.30 10.47 3 128 GLM 4.5 Air 26.15 16.53 5 129 GPT-4o-mini-Audio-Preview 25.77 9.23 3 130 GPT-4o 25.60 18.42 7 131 LFM2-Audio-1.5B 25.44 0.00 2 132 GPT-4.1 25.05 19.22 9 133 Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct 24.12 5.38 3 134 Gemini 2.0 Flash 23.83 4.71 3 135 Mistral Medium 3 23.10 3.01 3 136 MiniMax M2.5 22.55 6.93 4 137 Llama 4 Maverick 17B 18.29 9.46 9
Similar Articles
Ranked AI models by what people actually use instead of benchmark scores - the benchmark champion barely makes the top 20
A ranking of AI models by real usage, cost, and speed reveals that benchmark champions often trail in actual adoption, with cheaper/faster models like Flash Lite and GPT-5 leading over premium counterparts like Gemini 3.1 Pro.
@FinanceYF5: Someone has ranked every AI model
Someone has ranked all AI models, providing a comprehensive comparative evaluation.
Opus 5 is currently #1 on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Leaderboard
Opus 5 has claimed the top spot on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Leaderboard, which evaluates AI models across multiple benchmarks including the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and AA-Briefcase.
I built a live ranking of every AI agent and foundation model (open source)
A developer launched AgentTape, a live ranking site that aggregates data from multiple sources (GitHub, Hugging Face, OpenRouter, etc.) to score and compare public AI agents and foundation models, aiming to provide a more holistic evaluation beyond benchmarks.
@cline: 5 months ago the highest score on Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index was 51 (GPT-5.4 xhigh). This week DeepSeek V4-…
A tweet notes that DeepSeek V4-Flash scored 50 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, close to GPT-5.4's 51 from five months ago, and predicts local models will become the majority choice within two years.