[NeurIPS 2026] Will you be submitting your code alongside your submissions? [D]
Summary
NeurIPS 2026 authors debate whether to submit code, balancing credibility gains against plagiarism fears.
Similar Articles
How do you anonymize code for a conference submission? [D]
Author seeks advice on anonymizing GitHub repositories when submitting AI/ML papers to conferences.
CVPR - How to identify if an accepted paper has ethical issues (plagiarism)? [D]
A CVPR 2026 accepted paper is accused of copying equations, figures and key ideas from an earlier arXiv submission without citation, highlighting gaps in conference plagiarism checks.
@tdietterich: Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name as an author of a paper, each author tak…
Tom Dietterich reminds arXiv authors that signing as an author means taking full responsibility for all contents, regardless of how they were generated, highlighting implications for AI-generated content.
Why write code in 2026
Argues that despite AI coding agents, humans still benefit from writing code for better understanding, ownership, and maintaining software quality.
Why doesn't the ML research community limit the number of submissions per author? [D]
A researcher questions why the ML community doesn't limit submissions per author to manage review quality, citing successful practices in other fields like Security and Computer Architecture.