@tdietterich: Attention @arxiv authors: Our Code of Conduct states that by signing your name as an author of a paper, each author tak…
Summary
Tom Dietterich reminds arXiv authors that signing as an author means taking full responsibility for all contents, regardless of how they were generated, highlighting implications for AI-generated content.
Similar Articles
Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work
ArXiv is implementing a new policy that bans authors for one year if submitted papers show clear evidence of unchecked AI generation, such as hallucinated references or LLM comments, reinforcing that authors are fully responsible for content regardless of how it was produced.
ArXiv will ban researchers who upload papers full of AI slop
ArXiv, a popular preprint platform, will ban authors for one year if they submit papers containing clear signs of unchecked LLM-generated content, such as hallucinated references or LLM meta-comments, to reduce AI slop.
@timoreilly: I wrote this post (The Collaborative Exoskeleton of AI Science) a month or so ago and then forgot to publish it! It’s w…
Tim O'Reilly discusses the challenges of integrating AI into scientific publishing, including hallucinated citations, propagation of retracted papers, and training on compromised literature, and calls for adapting existing scientific infrastructure for AI use.
How do you anonymize code for a conference submission? [D]
Author seeks advice on anonymizing GitHub repositories when submitting AI/ML papers to conferences.
Ars Technica: Our newsroom AI policy
Ars Technica published its newsroom AI policy, detailing strict rules on sourcing, image use, and accountability when AI tools are involved in reporting.