Ars Technica: Our newsroom AI policy

Hacker News Top News

Summary

Ars Technica published its newsroom AI policy, detailing strict rules on sourcing, image use, and accountability when AI tools are involved in reporting.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 04/23/26, 06:26 AM

# Our newsroom AI policy Source: [https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/](https://arstechnica.com/staff/2026/04/our-newsroom-ai-policy/) When we attribute a statement, a position, or a quote to a named source, that material comes from direct engagement with interviews, transcripts, published statements, or documents reviewed by the reporter\. AI tools must not be used to generate, extract, or summarize material that is then attributed to a named source, whether as a direct quote, a paraphrase, or a characterization of someone’s views\. We don’t publish claims based solely on AI\-generated summaries, and reporters may not represent any material as “reviewed” unless they have examined it directly\. Every author who uses AI tools in the course of reporting a story must disclose that use to their editors, and authors remain fully responsible for their content\. ## Images, audio, and video Our visual content, including listing images, illustrations, and video, is produced by our editorial and art teams or sourced from photography services and wire providers\. Our creative team may use AI tools in the production of certain visual material, but the creative direction and editorial judgment are human\-driven\. We do not publish AI\-generated images, audio, or video as authentic documentation of real events\. We do not alter documentary media in ways that change their meaning\. Standard production work, like color correction, cropping, and contrast adjustments, is fine\. When synthetic media is used in the context of reporting on AI, it will be clearly identified as AI\-generated, with that disclosure placed as close to the material as possible\. ## Accountability is non\-negotiable Anyone who uses AI tools in our editorial workflow is responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the resulting work\. This responsibility cannot be transferred to colleagues, editors, or the tools themselves\. More broadly, maintaining the standards in this policy is a shared obligation across our editorial operation\. These standards have governed our editorial work since AI tooling became available\. When violations occur, we take action\. We’re publishing this reader\-facing version because our readers deserve to see the rules we hold ourselves to, not just trust that they exist\. *This policy was last updated April 22, 2026\.*

Similar Articles

AI Policy

Hacker News Top

An individual published a professional policy refusing to use AI in their work due to concerns about ethics, privacy, quality, and economic impacts, while acknowledging the pervasiveness of AI in the industry.

AI isn’t enough to protect social media communities from AI

Ars Technica

Ars Technica reports on the limitations of AI-based content moderation, highlighting biases against marginalized groups and the need for human oversight, while noting Reddit's expansion of Rules Hub to give human moderators more control.

Artificial Intelligence Policy

Hacker News Top

Berkeley Law has announced an AI policy effective Summer 2026 that restricts AI use in coursework and exams to promote critical thinking and ethical lawyering skills, with exceptions for research and instructor-approved cases.

Oh Lord, AI Reporters Are Actually Breaking Big News

Wired

A WIRED piece examines how AI-run newsrooms like RuntimeWire are breaking real news faster than human reporters, using AI agents to source, write, edit, and publish stories with minimal human oversight.