@ModelScope2022: SciJudge-30B and 4B learn to predict which scientific work will carry stronger citation impact. License: Apache-2.0 30B…

X AI KOLs Timeline Models

Summary

ModelScope releases SciJudge-30B and SciJudge-4B, models trained on millions of arXiv papers to predict citation impact, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy surpassing larger models like GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Pro.

SciJudge-30B and 4B learn to predict which scientific work will carry stronger citation impact. License: Apache-2.0 30B https://modelscope.ai/models/openmoss/SciJudge-30B-2605… 4B https://modelscope.ai/models/openmoss/SciJudge-4B-2605… https://modelscope.ai/papers/2603.14473… Scientific Judge accuracy: SciJudge-30B reaches 80.6 in-domain, surpassing GPT-5.2, GLM-5, and Gemini 3 Pro; SciJudge-4B also outperforms much larger baseline models Data signal: built from 2.1M arXiv papers and 696,758 field- and time-matched citation-based preference pairs Training: GRPO with DAPO loss and citation-based pairwise rewards
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/03/26, 02:29 AM

SciJudge-30B and 4B learn to predict which scientific work will carry stronger citation impact. License: Apache-2.0

30B https://modelscope.ai/models/openmoss/SciJudge-30B-2605… 4B https://modelscope.ai/models/openmoss/SciJudge-4B-2605… https://modelscope.ai/papers/2603.14473…

Scientific Judge accuracy: SciJudge-30B reaches 80.6 in-domain, surpassing GPT-5.2, GLM-5, and Gemini 3 Pro; SciJudge-4B also outperforms much larger baseline models

Data signal: built from 2.1M arXiv papers and 696,758 field- and time-matched citation-based preference pairs

Training: GRPO with DAPO loss and citation-based pairwise rewards

Similar Articles

Reward Modeling for Scientific Writing Evaluation

arXiv cs.CL

This paper proposes SciRM, cost-efficient open-source reward models tailored for evaluating scientific writing through a two-stage training framework that optimizes evaluation preferences and reasoning capabilities. The models generalize across diverse scientific writing tasks without requiring task-specific retraining, addressing limitations of existing LLM-based judges on domain-specific evaluation criteria.