Gemini 3.5 Flash looks worse than it seems on Artificial Analysis

Reddit r/singularity Models
gemini benchmark cost-analysis performance-comparison

Summary

Comparison showing that Gemini 3.5 Flash scores slightly lower than Gemini 3.1 Pro in Artificial Analysis benchmarks and has a higher total benchmark cost despite lower per-token API pricing.

Looking at Artificial Analysis, Gemini 3.5 Flash seems to compare strangely against Gemini 3.1 Pro. Numbers from Artificial Analysis: **Gemini 3.1 Pro** \- Intelligence score: **57** \- Cost: **$892** \- Pricing: **$2 / $12** per 1M input/output tokens **Gemini 3.5 Flash** \- Intelligence score: **55** \- Cost: **$1,552** \- Pricing: **$1.50 / $9** per 1M input/output tokens So Gemini 3.5 Flash scores slightly lower than Gemini 3.1 Pro, **55 vs 57**, but costs more in their benchmark, **$1,552 vs $892**. The per-token API price is lower than Pro, but the total benchmark cost ends up higher.
Original Article

Similar Articles

Gemini 3.5 Flash (Low) (1 minute read)

TLDR AI

Google introduces Gemini 3.5 Flash (Low), a new model variant that uses about 45% fewer tokens than the Medium version while outperforming the older Gemini 3 Flash (High) on SWE tasks. They have also reset quotas for all paid plans.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Benchmarks

Reddit r/singularity

Benchmark results for the Gemini 3.5 Flash model are discussed, likely showcasing its performance across various AI tasks.