Vertical Standardisation for High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act: A Domain-Specific Framework for Algorithmic Hiring

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This paper proposes a vertical, domain-specific framework for standardizing high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act, focusing on algorithmic hiring and ranking-based recruitment systems, with concrete recommendations for risk management, data governance, explainability, human oversight, and post-deployment monitoring.

arXiv:2607.12588v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: According to the recent European legislation, high-risk AI systems will have to adapt in order to comply with requirements related to specific areas, like risk management, data quality and governance, logging and traceability, technical documentation, transparency, human oversight, and accuracy, as outlined in the European Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. As the standardisation process for AI is expected to remain iterative and, so far, there are no European standards on AI fully covering the challenges of algorithmic hiring, we propose specific standardisation-oriented recommendations related to the relevant AI areas specified by the European Commission. For each of these areas, we set the context by describing the requirements that AI systems in high-risk domains, and especially in recruitment, should fulfil, as well as the activities that should be carried out to ensure their appropriate use and desired performance, in line with the requirements deriving from the AI Act. Unlike existing horizontal approaches to AI governance and standardisation, this paper contributes a vertical, domain-specific framework for algorithmic hiring, and especially ranking-based recruitment systems, by mapping the requirements of the AI Act to concrete standardisation recommendations, focusing on lifecycle discrimination risks, fairness-aware data governance, explainability, human oversight, and post-deployment monitoring in recruitment systems. Even though our recommendations were informed by the outcomes of the European project FINDHR, they are not tied to the project's technical artefacts and could be implemented using alternative methods, tools, or governance mechanisms.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/15/26, 04:20 AM

# Vertical Standardisation for High-Risk AI Systems under the EU AI Act: A Domain-Specific Framework for Algorithmic Hiring
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12588](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12588)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.12588)

> Abstract:According to the recent European legislation, high\-risk AI systems will have to adapt in order to comply with requirements related to specific areas, like risk management, data quality and governance, logging and traceability, technical documentation, transparency, human oversight, and accuracy, as outlined in the European Artificial Intelligence \(AI\) Act\. As the standardisation process for AI is expected to remain iterative and, so far, there are no European standards on AI fully covering the challenges of algorithmic hiring, we propose specific standardisation\-oriented recommendations related to the relevant AI areas specified by the European Commission\. For each of these areas, we set the context by describing the requirements that AI systems in high\-risk domains, and especially in recruitment, should fulfil, as well as the activities that should be carried out to ensure their appropriate use and desired performance, in line with the requirements deriving from the AI Act\. Unlike existing horizontal approaches to AI governance and standardisation, this paper contributes a vertical, domain\-specific framework for algorithmic hiring, and especially ranking\-based recruitment systems, by mapping the requirements of the AI Act to concrete standardisation recommendations, focusing on lifecycle discrimination risks, fairness\-aware data governance, explainability, human oversight, and post\-deployment monitoring in recruitment systems\. Even though our recommendations were informed by the outcomes of the European project FINDHR, they are not tied to the project's technical artefacts and could be implemented using alternative methods, tools, or governance mechanisms\.

## Submission history

From: Anna Gatzioura \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/e10fc48d/2607.12588)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:00:27 UTC \(834 KB\)

Similar Articles

Harmonizing AI Safety Thresholds

arXiv cs.AI

This paper proposes a methodology for deriving harmonized AI safety thresholds across frontier AI companies to address inconsistencies in existing thresholds, covering misuse risks and automated AI R&D, and highlighting empirical gaps.

Frontier AI regulation: Managing emerging risks to public safety

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI proposes a regulatory framework for 'frontier AI' models that pose potential public safety risks, advocating for standard-setting processes, registration/reporting requirements, and compliance mechanisms including pre-deployment risk assessments and post-deployment monitoring.