Not everything needs an agent - 3 questions I use to decide agent vs script
Summary
The author shares three questions to decide between AI agents and scripts, emphasizing procedure knowledge, item count, and independence, with cost and speed trade-offs.
Similar Articles
4 AI workflows that are just scripts (and the one that actually needs an agent)
A discussion on when to use scripts versus AI agents, arguing that most claimed AI agents are actually simple scripts, and only truly dynamic decision-making tasks warrant agents.
One test decides if you actually need an AI Agent
This article presents a simple test to distinguish between AI agents and traditional workflows based on runtime decision dependency, discusses architectural trade-offs, and highlights common production failures in agentic systems.
"At what point does adding another agent actually hurt your system? Asking because my 6-agent pipeline is slower and less reliable than my old 2-agent one
A developer shares real-world experiences with AI orchestration frameworks (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen), noting trade-offs between ease of prototyping and production reliability, and asks the community about handling failures, human-in-the-loop, and token costs.
Before I let an agent call a tool in prod, I ask these five things
A practitioner shares a pre-production checklist for letting AI agents call state-changing tools: clear principal identity, explicit delegation scope, tool listing disclosures, app readiness (idempotency, audit trails, per-agent auth), and fail-closed behavior when policy or auth is down.
Can someone help me buy in or understand the use case for AI Agents?
A software developer questions the practical value of AI agents, expressing concerns about control, accountability, and whether manual automation combined with LLMs is more reliable than delegating to autonomous agents.