4 AI workflows that are just scripts (and the one that actually needs an agent)
Summary
A discussion on when to use scripts versus AI agents, arguing that most claimed AI agents are actually simple scripts, and only truly dynamic decision-making tasks warrant agents.
Similar Articles
Are we calling too many workflows “agents”?
The author questions whether many so-called AI agents are better described as workflows, arguing that for repeatable browser tasks, defined workflows may be more reliable than agents that reinterpret steps each time.
Can AI agents realistically automate complex workflows without human intervention?
A discussion about whether AI agents can reliably automate complex, multi-step workflows without constant human supervision, asking about current limitations and experiences.
Where AI agents actually break in real workflows (not demos)
A discussion on where AI agents fail in real workflows, highlighting issues with coordination, reliability under messy inputs, and the challenge of reducing human intervention in production.
Everyone is selling AI agents, but almost nobody is selling the workflows to make them useful.
The article argues that while many are building and selling AI agents, the real value lies in the workflows and training that make them useful, not the underlying technology.
AI agents are starting to expose how broken most workflows already were
The article argues that AI agents are revealing how unstructured and chaotic many corporate workflows actually are, suggesting that successful automation depends more on clean systems and documentation than on advanced models.