Are we calling too many workflows “agents”?

I’ve been thinking about why AI agent demos can look so impressive, but feel harder to trust in everyday use. For repeatable browser tasks, the issue isn’t always whether an agent can complete the task once. It’s whether it can do the same thing reliably every time. A lot of the work is pretty procedural: \- open this page \- read this status \- copy this field \- submit this form \- stop if it gets blocked \- flag it if something is missing \- return a clean result if it works For that kind of task, I can see why a defined workflow might be easier to trust than having an agent re-plan or re-interpret the steps on every run. I’m not saying agents are usless. I’m just wondering if they make more sense for messy or ambiguous tasks, while workflows make more sense for repeatable ones. Curious if others are seeing this too, especially with automations that need to run more than once.