Social Chain of Thought: A Multi-Agent Architecture Grounded in Medical Differential Diagnosis Methodology
Summary
This arXiv paper introduces Social Chain of Thought (SCoT), a multi-agent architecture for medical differential diagnosis that structures multi-round specialist conversations. Evaluations show it outperforms single-agent and monolithic inference, particularly on the hardest diagnostic cases.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/13/26, 03:26 PM
# Social Chain of Thought: A Multi-Agent Architecture Grounded in Medical Differential Diagnosis Methodology Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11420](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11420) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.11420) > Abstract:Medical diagnostic reasoning is a high\-impact use case for LLMs that carries significant implications for the health and wellbeing of users\. When OpenAI \(2026\) reports that more than 5% of ChatGPT messages globally are healthcare\-related, the transparency of these systems becomes a serious design concern\. This is especially true for complex cases, where differential diagnosis often requires integrating multiple forms of specialist reasoning\. Existing work has proposed multi\-agent approaches to medical diagnosis, but it remains unclear when such systems are needed, why they help, and where they outperform monolithic inference\. We introduce Social Chain of Thought \(SCoT\),a multi\-round pipeline for medical differential diagnosis that structures multi\-agent interaction as a deliberative framework for collabora\. tive LLM reasoning\. Evaluating SCoT against single\-agent baselines, one\-agent pipeline ablations, and best\-of\-n scaling, we show that its recall advantage is not reproduced by monolithic inference alone\. SCoT is most successful in the hardest diagnostic cases, where multiple rounds of specialist conversation help recover ground\-truth diagnoses and converge on a higher\-recall differential\. ## Submission history From: Del Coburn \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/49d391b9/2608.11420)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 11 Aug 2026 20:38:03 UTC \(492 KB\)
Similar Articles
COTCAgent: Preventive Consultation via Probabilistic Chain-of-Thought Completion
COTCAgent is a hierarchical reasoning framework for longitudinal electronic health records that uses a probabilistic chain-of-thought completion approach, achieving 90.47% Top-1 accuracy on a self-built dataset and outperforming existing medical agents.
Collective Intelligence with Foundation Models
This paper presents a multi-agent reasoning framework where multiple foundation models collaborate through structured critique and aggregation, demonstrating that model heterogeneity significantly improves step-wise reasoning accuracy and reduces variance across domains.
MODF-SIR: A Multi-agent Omni-modal Distilled Framework for Social Intelligence Reasoning
This paper proposes MODF-SIR, a multi-agent collaborative framework built on a lightweight multimodal large language model for social intelligence reasoning. It employs knowledge distillation, long-tail event extraction, and test-time adaptation to achieve state-of-the-art results with reduced training data.
ArogyaSutra: A Multi-Agent Framework for Multimodal Medical Reasoning in Indic Languages
ArogyaBodha dataset and ArogyaSutra framework enhance multilingual medical reasoning in low-resource settings through diverse data integration and actor-critic multi-agent reasoning.
Evaluating Multi-Turn Multimodal Diagnostic Reasoning on Challenging Real-World Clinical Cases
This paper presents an evaluation of multi-turn multimodal diagnostic reasoning using challenging real-world clinical cases, aiming to assess AI models' ability to handle complex medical scenarios.