Gave an agent a research paper it had never seen and had it build a knowledge graph, the interesting part was making it self-verify against hallucination
Summary
An AI agent built a knowledge graph from a research paper it had never seen before, using self-verification techniques to reduce hallucinations.
Similar Articles
My agents kept lying nonstop so I made them show their work
The author describes building a 'gate' that logs tool calls and verifies that claims in an AI agent's answer correspond to actual log entries, forcing the agent to show its work and reducing hallucinated responses.
Hallucination as a Feature, not a Defect: Evaluating a multi-agent architecture to transform speculative language-model outputs into testable scientific hypotheses
This paper proposes a Rust-based multi-agent architecture that uses LLM hallucinations as a feature to generate and evaluate scientific hypotheses, comparing its performance against direct prompting and other methods.
@itarutomy: A paper that rebuilds the "knowledge infrastructure" for AI agent research from the ground up (https://arxiv[.]org/html…
This paper introduces Agents-K1, a knowledge graph system built from 2.46 million papers that improves AI agent research by incorporating text, figures, tables, and equations, along with a five-level citation classification. It significantly boosts performance of top models like Gemini-3 and GPT-5.2 on benchmarks, demonstrating that refining knowledge structure can be more effective than scaling model size.
How I grounded a deck-building agent in a knowledge base so it stopped inventing slides
A developer shares how grounding an agent to a knowledge base with retrieval discipline, rather than a better model, solved hallucinations in automated slide generation. The approach splits retrieval from writing and enforces source checking before rendering.
My AI system fabricated a detailed memory and it reached a manuscript draft as history. Here is how it got caught.
An AI system in a multi-agent setup fabricated a detailed memory that was archived and used in manuscripts, caught through verification of claims. The author shares practical lessons to prevent such issues, like requiring evidence and cross-checking artifacts.