Gave an agent a research paper it had never seen and had it build a knowledge graph, the interesting part was making it self-verify against hallucination
Summary
An AI agent built a knowledge graph from a research paper it had never seen before, using self-verification techniques to reduce hallucinations.
Similar Articles
My agents kept lying nonstop so I made them show their work
The author describes building a 'gate' that logs tool calls and verifies that claims in an AI agent's answer correspond to actual log entries, forcing the agent to show its work and reducing hallucinated responses.
@itarutomy: A paper that rebuilds the "knowledge infrastructure" for AI agent research from the ground up (https://arxiv[.]org/html…
This paper introduces Agents-K1, a knowledge graph system built from 2.46 million papers that improves AI agent research by incorporating text, figures, tables, and equations, along with a five-level citation classification. It significantly boosts performance of top models like Gemini-3 and GPT-5.2 on benchmarks, demonstrating that refining knowledge structure can be more effective than scaling model size.
How I grounded a deck-building agent in a knowledge base so it stopped inventing slides
A developer shares how grounding an agent to a knowledge base with retrieval discipline, rather than a better model, solved hallucinations in automated slide generation. The approach splits retrieval from writing and enforces source checking before rendering.
Source or It Didn't Happen: A Multi-Agent Framework for Citation Hallucination Detection
This paper introduces CiteTracer, a multi-agent framework for detecting citation hallucinations in LLM-generated scientific writing, achieving high accuracy on synthetic and real-world benchmarks.
My AI agent confidently gave me completely wrong information. Here's what I learned.
A developer shares a personal experience of their AI agent producing hallucinated data and the lessons learned about verification and prompt specificity.