Synthetic Consumer Insight Generation with Large Language Models
Summary
This research examines whether LLMs can generate synthetic consumer data for projective techniques, comparing human and LLM responses on city tourism perceptions and finding substantial overlap but differences in style and diversity.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/08/26, 04:38 AM
# Synthetic Consumer Insight Generation with Large Language Models Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05761](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05761) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.05761) > Abstract:Modern data\-driven marketing relies on large amounts of consumer data, yet collecting such data can be costly, time\-consuming, and difficult to scale\. This research examines whether large language models \(LLMs\) can be used to generate synthetic consumer data for projective techniques, a set of methods designed to elicit consumer associations, emotions, wants, and needs\. We test LLM\-generated responses across multiple projective tasks, LLMs, prompting strategies, and temperature settings, and compare them with human responses from a primary research study on perceptions of city tourism destinations\. Human and LLM responses were analyzed using linguistic measures, diversity and concentration metrics, topic models, and top\-term analyses\. The results show substantial overlap between human and LLM responses in broad topics and associations, but also important differences in style, linguistic structure, and the way diversity is generated\. Recommendations are given on how to best utilize LLMs for generating synthetic consumer data, how model and prompt choices shape response quality, and on recognizing the limitations of LLM synthetic consumer data generation\. ## Submission history From: Stephen L\. France \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/827ad16a/2607.05761)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 7 Jul 2026 02:38:41 UTC \(985 KB\)
Similar Articles
Evaluating LLMs as Human Surrogates in Controlled Experiments
This paper evaluates whether off-the-shelf LLMs can reliably simulate human responses in controlled behavioral experiments by comparing LLM-generated data with human survey responses on accuracy perception. The findings show that while LLMs capture directional effects and aggregate belief-updating patterns, they do not consistently match human-scale effect magnitudes, clarifying when synthetic LLM data can serve as behavioral proxies.
Can Large Language Models Imitate Human Speech for Clinical Assessment? LLM-Driven Data Augmentation for Cognitive Score Prediction
This paper proposes a large language model-driven data augmentation framework using GPT-5 to generate synthetic oral monologues from written anchors for cognitive score prediction from speech. A similarity-guided selection strategy consistently reduces prediction error, particularly for minority low-score participants.
Can LLMs Think Like Consumers? Benchmarking Crowd-Level Reaction Reconstruction with ConsumerSimBench
Introduces ConsumerSimBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs' ability to reconstruct crowd-level consumer reactions from real Chinese social media topics. Tests show frontier models cover only 47.8% of real reaction criteria, highlighting a gap between technical benchmark performance and social intuition.
Can Large Language Models Revolutionize Survey Research? Experiments with Disaster Preparedness Responses
This paper presents a five-stage framework integrating large language models into survey research, addressing declining response rates, sample bias, and fraudulent completions. Using 2024 Hurricane Milton survey data, the authors propose a theory-informed LLM (A-TLM) that outperforms classical imputation methods in missing-data scenarios and demonstrates manageable hallucination risk through grounded refusal.
Re-Centering Humans in LLM Personalization
This paper studies the gap between synthetic and human data for evaluating LLM personalization across three stages: attribute extraction, relevance matching, and response generation. Results show models perform worse on real human data, and the authors introduce lightweight training interventions to improve alignment.