Ending my elixir exploratory writing

Hacker News Top News

Summary

Lucas Sifoni reflects on ending his exploratory writing about Elixir, citing concerns over LLMs dominating code generation and diminishing imaginative human contributions in programming communities.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/02/26, 02:51 PM

# Lucas Sifoni - Ending my elixir exploratory writing Source: [https://lucassifoni.info/blog/the-end-of-this-elixir-log/](https://lucassifoni.info/blog/the-end-of-this-elixir-log/) ## Ending my elixir exploratory writing Aug 31 2026 --- To my surprise this has been posted on HN, where a few people wrote they felt the same*vibe*about writing online today\. Thanks for sharing this impression publicly\. YDiscussion on HN :[https://news\.ycombinator\.com/item?id=49534921](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49534921) I’ve started this log 3 and a half years ago with experiment\-like articles in Elixir related to simulating a telescope, which became my off\-work practice for a while \(in addition of being already invested in optics building\), brought me to a few conferences, and allowed to meet people who became actual friends\. It was not my first \(nor my last\) collection of articles online\. Writing here, first about thingsdone with elixir, then about thingsthe Erlang virtual machine can dowas a great way to balance my current era of professionnal and personal programming\. I still believe the BEAM is a great platform and that despite being often advertised for high scale, it will be critical to recognize that no company is too small to benefit from it\. The BEAM is also a platform subtle enough to keep learning for years and I encourage everyone to dig in\. What I don’t find making sense anymore is the practice of publicly digging a programming\-related subject with the bit of creativity that came with the joy of research\. LLMs now write most code in volume in the communities I know of, discussion has collapsed, and open\-source now means “solo developer re\-generates everything they need from scratch” in a lot of places \(which I talked about in[Care over time is the only software success metric now](https://lucassifoni.info/blog/only-evaluable-criteria-for-software-is-care-and-longevity)\)\. This means that for some,imagination is now the limit\. We already see lots of blogs, talks, forum posts, and even github discussions being machine\-written, where people succumbed to delegate imagination and voice\. There even are in the elixir community a few people letting Claude borrow their name and profile picture while handling all interactions\. I won’t name them here but I find this very unsettling\. I don’t blame them directly, these are strange times and it asks everyone to adapt\. This process of adapting can take a lot of weird intermediary shapes\. So, since the act of mimicking the development of an idea in prose and code can now be fully hand\-waved, do I want to offer the other parts, ideation and imagination, as small as they can be, to be fed to the beast ? From now on, I do not \! I’ll continue writing on other subjects and eventual elixir non\-experimental work\.

Similar Articles

Now what?

Lobsters Hottest

A blog post reflecting on the surge of LLM-assisted hobby projects, questioning their real-world utility and urging creators to consider the purpose beyond the initial dopamine rush.

Quoting Bryan Cantrill

Simon Willison's Blog

Bryan Cantrill critiques LLMs for lacking the optimization constraint of human laziness, arguing that LLMs will unnecessarily complicate systems rather than improve them, and highlighting how human time limitations drive the development of efficient abstractions.