@StartupArchive_: Ben Horowitz shares 4 principles for choosing a cofounder The first and most important principle is to not let anxiety …
Summary
Ben Horowitz shares four principles for choosing a cofounder, emphasizing not letting anxiety drive the decision, avoiding friendships, working with respected long-time acquaintances, and equal equity splits.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/30/26, 11:55 PM
Ben Horowitz shares 4 principles for choosing a cofounder
The first and most important principle is to not let anxiety drive your decision. Ben recalls the feeling when you first start a startup:
“You’re like, ‘Oh my god, what if this doesn’t work?’… Your guts are boiling, you’re feeling very uneasy. And so there’s a tendency to grab the closest cofounder you can find to say, ‘Okay it’s not just me now. Whew!’ That’s a big mistake.”
Ben’s second principle for choosing a cofounder comes from John D. Rockefeller who said:
“A friendship founded on business is better than a business founded on friendship.”
Ben advises founders to be careful about going into business with your friends. Friendship is generally bad reason to choose someone as a cofounder.
The third principle Ben argues for is to work with people you’ve known for a while and truly respect. This is how The Beetles were formed, and they went on to be one of the greatest bands of all time. Ben juxtaposes with The Monkees who were put together by the record company:
“The Monkees were actually pretty successful for a little while but there was something just fundamentally inauthentic about them… You are generally better off being The Beatles than The Monkees. Work with people who you’ve known for a while, respect, and feel like you can be teammates with for a long, long time.”
The last point Ben makes is about equity splits:
“If you’re not willing to equally split the company from an equity standpoint with your founders, that’s probably a mistake.”
You also have to decide who is going to be CEO. Ben generally will not fund startups without a clear CEO:
“When you choose to share command, it’s because you can’t agree with your cofounder who should run the company. But everybody in the company is going to suffer because of that — you don’t have clear command and decisions have to get made twice.”
Source: @StartupGrind (Feb 2014)
Similar Articles
@StartupArchive_: Ben Horowitz to startup CEOs: “There’s always an answer” Ben recalls Business Week writing a cover story about his comp…
Ben Horowitz shares advice for startup CEOs facing media criticism and internal stress, emphasizing the need to believe there is always an answer.
@StartupArchive_: Marc Andreessen on handling a crisis: “There are no silver bullets, only lead bullets” Marc reflects on his partner Ben…
Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz share advice on handling business crises: there are no silver bullets, only lead bullets—hard work and execution are key.
@StartupArchive_: Peter Thiel on the difference between the best founders and “professional CEOs” In his book Zero To One, Thiel wrote: “…
Peter Thiel shares insights on why founders are crucial for building great companies, contrasting them with professional CEOs and using Mark Zuckerberg's rejection of Yahoo's acquisition as an example.
@StartupArchive_: Sam Altman on the Paul Graham advice that not enough founders take to heart “One of the things that Paul Graham used to…
Sam Altman shares Paul Graham's advice on being 'relentlessly resourceful,' emphasizing the importance of persistently trying different approaches to solve problems, a lesson many founders overlook.
@StartupArchive_: Peter Thiel on the type of company more startup founders should build Thiel first emphasizes his belief that when start…
Peter Thiel argues that founders should aim for monopolies, highlighting 'Complex Coordination'—integrating many pieces into something new—as an overlooked but powerful category, citing Apple, Tesla, and SpaceX as examples.