Anyone NOT on full auto when coding with local LLMs?
Summary
The article discusses developers' preferences for full automation versus manual workflows when using local LLMs for coding.
Similar Articles
Do you let LLMs write both your tests and your code?
A Lobsters discussion asking whether teams allow LLMs to write both production code and tests, with the author considering a policy restricting AI generation to only one of the two to avoid tautological, over-engineered results.
Using Local Coding Agents
A tutorial by Sebastian Raschka on setting up a fully local coding agent using open-source tools and open-weight LLMs, covering motivations, setup, and advantages over proprietary services.
Automating AI Away
The article discusses the philosophy of combining non-deterministic LLMs with deterministic tools and formal workflows to automate AI development, using Beagle SCM as an example. It suggests letting LLMs automate themselves away in favor of reliable deterministic processes.
@bibryam: How I use LLMs as a staff engineer in 2026 https://seangoedecke.com/how-i-use-llms-in-2026… The biggest AI workflow cha…
A staff engineer describes how LLM agents have evolved by 2026 to become reliable collaborators for coding, debugging, and codebase research, while humans retain responsibility for judgment and review.
Ask HN: Is anyone experimenting with different ways of using LLMs for coding?
A Hacker News user asks the community about experimental approaches to using LLMs for coding, expressing frustration with current prompt-response loops and seeking fundamentally different methods.