@MadeshiaPramod: Jane Street rejected this $385,000-a-year vibe coder because he refused to use Claude Code. During the interview for a Tier-1 fund, a 32-minute vibe coding session was livestreamed. You can see the whole process: live coding, pressure questions, the moment they realized his tech stack didn't match theirs…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

Jane Street rejected a highly paid programmer who refused to use Claude Code during an interview for a Tier-1 fund, highlighting the increasing trend of screening candidates based on their proficiency with specific AI coding tools.

Jane Street rejected this $385,000-a-year vibe coder because he refused to use Claude Code During the interview for a Tier-1 fund, a 32-minute vibe coding session was livestreamed You can see the whole process: live coding, pressure questions, the moment they realized his tech stack didn't match theirs Now every Tier-1 fund screens candidates by tool stack. Claude Code https://t.co/6VmKxOvLFv
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/20/26, 04:34 PM

Jane Street rejected a vibe coder earning $385,000 a year because he refused to use Claude Code

During the interview at the Tier 1 fund, a 32-minute vibe coding session was live-streamed

You can see the whole process: live coding, pressure questions, the moment they realized his tech stack didn’t match theirs

Now every Tier-1 fund is screening candidates based on tool stack. Claude Code https://t.co/6VmKxOvLFv

Similar Articles

@faiford: A programmer with an annual salary of $385,000, accustomed to vibe coding, refused to use Claude Code during an interview at top quant firm Jane Street, and was immediately disqualified. The raw 32-minute live coding interview footage was released unedited, truthfully recording everything from live coding, Q&A, to tool compatibility issues.

X AI KOLs Timeline

A programmer earning $385,000 per year failed his interview at Jane Street for refusing to use Claude Code, reflecting that AI tools have become industry entry standards. On Polymarket, there are bets on the penetration speed of AI tools.

@mubeitech: Kicked out of an Ivy League school, Roy Lee landed $5 M in 24 h. He cracked Silicon Valley’s playbook with Interview Coder—software built to cheat in tech interviews—and proved it by breezing through an Amazon internship round, then posted the whole stunt online.

X AI KOLs Timeline

Roy Lee raised $5 million in 24 hours for Interview Coder, a tool engineered to cheat in coding interviews, after demonstrating it by passing an Amazon internship interview and publishing the recording.

@Michaelzsguo: This episode of Jane Street's podcast is incredibly hardcore and practical! It dives deep into how AI coding tools get rolled out internally at a company — very concrete, very thorough, and well worth studying. This is an episode of Jane Street's official tech podcast Signals and Threads, hosted by their head of tech…

X AI KOLs Timeline

An episode of Jane Street's official podcast Signals and Threads, hosted by Ron Minsky, featuring internal tools engineer John Crepezzi sharing hands-on experience rolling out AI coding tools at the company. Topics include the in-house JaneGPT/AIDE platform, dedicated AI identities and permissions, Slack-triggered tasks, whitelist-based sandboxes, guarding against reward hacking, and the importance of validation in code review.